Dec 7, 2024
Callie Lyons
editorial@newsandsentinel.com
In the face of a political climate that feels increasingly unfavorable, especially for environmentalists and those advocating for systemic change, it’s easy to feel overwhelmed and hopeless. The challenges–stagnant policies, rising climate impacts, and polarized discourse — can seem insurmountable. Yet, history shows that hope thrives in adversity, and progress often begins with small, focused steps.
Reframing hopelessness into hope starts with the realization that while circumstances may not change overnight, our response to them can. This means mastering the art of blooming where we’re planted, finding opportunities for growth and impact, even in the harshest conditions.
“Bloom where you’re planted” isn’t just a metaphor; it’s a strategy. Environmental advocates, youth activists, and marginalized groups all face unique barriers, yet their stories are filled with examples of persistence leading to progress. Local actions — whether installing solar panels on a school roof, planting community gardens, or enacting green municipal policies — have ripple effects.
When we accept our current position as a starting point, rather than a fixed limitation, we empower ourselves to turn challenges into opportunities for growth.
Change is rarely the work of one person or group — it’s the result of united efforts. Coalitions are essential for achieving progress in tough times. Youth activists partnering with scientists, environmental justice organizations collaborating with healthcare professionals, and faith-based groups joining hands with conservationists show the power of diverse alliances.
Challenges often force us to innovate, and the environmental movement is no stranger to doing more with less. Limited resources, whether time, funding, or political support, can inspire groundbreaking solutions.
This principle applies to personal action, too. You don’t need an unlimited budget to reduce waste, adopt sustainable habits, or educate others about climate issues. Small steps, like hosting a workshop or planting a pollinator garden, can inspire broader action.
At its core, this approach to reframing hopelessness is about rediscovering agency. When challenges feel overwhelming, the antidote lies in identifying what we can do and doing it with purpose. Here are three pillars to keep in mind:
Find Strength in Small Victories
Celebrate and share progress, no matter how modest. Whether it’s a city adopting a renewable energy standard or a community rallying to protect local wetlands, every win fuels the larger fight.
Collaborate Across Divides
Build unexpected alliances. Environmentalists working with businesses, or scientists partnering with religious groups, can create momentum by focusing on common ground.
Embrace a Vision for the Future
Use storytelling and education to paint a vivid picture of what’s possible. Hope isn’t passive–it’s the product of actionable plans and the belief that today’s work can create tomorrow’s change.
Yes, the road ahead is steep, and the challenges are vast. But adversity has always been the proving ground for progress. From the civil rights movement to the environmental victories of the past, history reminds us that persistence, collaboration, and creativity can overcome even the toughest odds.
So, let’s bloom where we’re planted. Let’s build coalitions that amplify our voices and find innovative ways to do more with less. And above all, let’s replace hopelessness with a hope grounded in action–a hope that fuels us to create the change we desperately need.
The future is unwritten, but it is not without authors. Together, we can write a story of resilience, collaboration, and hope. Let’s get to work.
***
Callie Lyons is a journalist, researcher and author who works for FITSNews. Her 2007 book “Stain-Resistant, Nonstick, Waterproof and Lethal: The Hidden Dangers of C8,” was the first to cover forever chemicals and their impact on communities — a story later told in the movie “Dark Waters.” Her investigative work has been featured in media outlets, publications, and documentaries all over the world. Lyons also appears in “Citizen Sleuth” — a 2023 documentary exploring the genre of true crime.
Posted: January 18, 2025 by main_y0ke11
Climate Corner: The Ohio Valley has a radiation problem
Jan 18, 2025
Randi Pokladnik
editorial@newsandsentinel.com
During the 60s, I remember the government conducted Civil Defense drills in my school. We were told to climb under our school desks, duck down, and cover our heads. We might have survived a bomb blast but the radioactive fallout could not be stopped. The nuclear disasters at Three-Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima have taught us that the radiation emitted during an accident or bombing will travel across the planet via prevailing winds and the jet stream and distribute some radiation to all of us.
Decades later, while pursuing my masters degree, I had the opportunity to visit Los Alamos, N.M. This city was built to house scientists secretly working on nuclear weapons and was the setting of the 2023 movie about J. Robert Oppenheimer, “father of the atomic bomb.” He was an American theoretical physicist who worked on the Manhattan Project and was the director of the Los Alamos Laboratory where the atomic bomb was developed.
I saw streets lined with barbed wire fencing, cameras mounted on every telephone or power pole, and guard stations at every corner. During our time there, we learned about the many experiments conducted by the federal government on unknowing citizens. When they detonated the Trinity bomb “officials chose not to evacuate the area, nor to warn residents of potential health effects.”
Native Americans who worked in Uranium mines died from radiation exposures. “From 1944 to 1986, nearly 30 million tons of uranium ore were extracted from Navajo lands.” Officials knew the mines (which were often located near or on reservations) exposed entire communities to radiation, but they failed to alert the workers and the families living in the region.
On Jan. 6, 2025, “The Environmental Protection Agency and Navajo Nation finalized a plan to transport one million cubic yards of waste from the Quivira Mines site to a disposal cell near Thoreau, N.M. The Quivira Mines are one of the largest and most high-risk uranium mine sites on the Navajo Nation” and according to EPA spokesman Michael Brogan, have high concentrations of Radium-226 and Uranium. The Safe Drinking Water Act sets the maximum contaminant level (MCL) for Radium-226 in drinking water at 5 pico Curies per liter (pCi/L).
Unfortunately, a similar scenario has been occurring in Southeastern Ohio. Since 2012, when fracking for oil and gas started in earnest in the tri-state area, communities, citizens, and oil and gas workers continue to be exposed to brine and fracking sludge that can contain alarming amounts of radioactive isotopes like Radium-226 and Radium-228. Every day, brine trucks that are lacking any warning placards or Material Safety Data Sheets, drive along our roads and through our towns transporting oilfield wastes from fracking well pads to Class II injection wells. In addition to bromine and chlorine salts, these trucks can also carry toxic chemicals, pit waste, refuse water, sludge, and even used frack sand along with water soluble Radium-226.
Justin Nobel’s book, “Petroleum 238” is an excellent source of information detailing how the oil and gas industry has been allowed to spew radiation across the United States in the form of billions of gallons of oilfield wastes. Oil and gas exploration and production wastes (brine and drilling muds) were exempted from the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Subtitle C in 1978. They are also exempted from Ohio’s hazardous waste regulations. This isn’t because the wastes are safe, in fact, officials admit the wastes could indeed be harmful to human health and the environment.
The primary reason for the exemption was “if the immense volume of oil and gas wastes were regulated as hazardous it would economically harm the industry.” When the law was revisited in 1980 under President Reagan, the Environmental Protection Agency kept the exemption, saying regulations would “cause a severe economic impact on the industry and on oil and gas production in the U.S.” Basically, as far as politicians and regulatory agencies are concerned, industry profits supersede any concern for the health of our communities.
A big fear is that the radiation from Radium-226 (which has a half-life of 1600 years) and Radium-228 (half-life 5.75 years) will be poisoning the tri-state region long after the fracking boom is over. Radium isotopes have been shown to cause bone, liver, and breast cancer in humans. “The Ohio Administrative Code (OAC) has set environmental discharge limits for Radium 226 and 228 at 60 pCi/L each,” yet it is not unusual for brine trucks to carry fluids testing above 3,000 pCi/L, with some as high as 7,300 pCi/L, according to the Buckeye Environmental Network brine factsheet on conventional and horizontal well brines; both contain Radium isotopes.
In 1985, Ohio’s General Assembly approved the use of vertical well oilfield brine to be used on roadways as a deicer and dust suppressant. In 2004, Ohio passed HB 278, “which took away local control on oil and gas regulation and granted Ohio Department of Natural Resources (ODNR) sole authority,” meaning local communities cannot stop an injection well from being constructed. There is an injection well less than ten miles from my home. Ohio has over 234 Class II injection wells and accepts wastes from out-of-state. Each day, countless brine trucks loaded with toxic horizontal well wastes travel along Tappan Lake, a drinking water source for Cadiz, Ohio.
We cannot depend on the ODNR or Ohio Environmental Protection Agency to safeguard our communities from oil and gas wastes. Several grassroots groups have taken on the task of educating the public about this radioactive nightmare. One of these is the Ohio Brine Task Force. “The Brine Task Force is a group of thoughtful and committed Ohioans interested in stopping the hazardous practice of brine spreading in our communities.”
The Buckeye Environmental Network is hosting a Statehouse Symposium at the State Capital- “Spreading Oilfield Brine on Ohio’s Roadways” on March 6 from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. where attendees will hear from workers affected by oilfield brine contamination and scientific experts on why this is an urgent issue to address.
***
Randi Pokladnik, Ph.D., of Uhrichsville, is a retired research chemist who volunteers with Mid Ohio Valley Climate Action. She has a doctorate degree in environmental studies and is certified in hazardous materials regulations.
Posted: January 11, 2025 by main_y0ke11
Climate Corner: Cost, convenience and conservation
Nov 2, 2024
Dean Banziger
editorial@newsandsentinel.com
I like to consider myself a conservationist, or in other words, concerned about our environment and limited resources. However, if I am honest with myself, it is not always a top priority. Cost and convenience are more often a deciding factor for me than impact on the environment. I just do not have unlimited funds or unlimited time to always make the “green” decision.
Often, though, cost and conservation due coincide. My recent car purchase is a good example.
Before making a final decision on buying a car, I debated first between gasoline and electric vehicles. Being a math teacher and former actuary, I crunched the numbers. Based on driving an average amount of 1,000 miles per month and getting 30 miles per gallon at $3.50 per gallon, a gas-powered vehicle would cost $1,680 to fuel each year. An average electric car gets 4 miles per kilowatt hour, and an average West Virginia household pays $.12 per kilowatt hour for electricity. So, based on traveling the same 1,000 miles per month, an average Wet Virginian would pay $360 to fuel a fully electric vehicle. I have kept my previous cars for about 10 years. So, looking only at fuel, I would save $1,392 per year, or $13,020 over the 10 years that I plan to own the vehicle.
Next, I looked at sticker prices. For new 2024 vehicles, the average cost of cars, after taxes and fees was around $30,000. Looking at EVs, the average new car cost was $40,000, after taxes and fees. The initial sticker price of EVs was significantly higher, but the federal government is now offering a $7,500 rebate for buying new EVs assembled in the United States (https://www.energy.gov/save/electric-vehicles). The rebate combined with the $13,000 in fuel savings make a new EV $3,000 less.
So, a new EV would be less expensive, over time, than new gas vehicles. While I could afford a payment on a $30,000 or even $40,000, this just seemed too much for me to spend. Also, if I financed the EV, the interest on the bigger loan would eat up a lot of my savings. To me, cars are a mode of transportation, not a fancy item to show off to friends. My wife and kids will be the first ones to tell you that I can be quite a miser.
So, I considered used cars. After talking a lot with others, I found a neighbor looking to sell their 2017 Chevy Bolt (fully electric) for the same cost that I was finding gas and hybrid cars of similar age. Well, what about battery life? After a little more research, I found that EVs lose just 2.3% of their battery life each year (https://www.evconnect.com/). This would give me the 10 years of life that I was looking for. As a bonus, Chevrolet recalled the batteries on the 2017 vehicle. So, the one I purchased had a brand new battery installed in 2022. Even if I had not had the good fortune of getting a new battery, the low battery loss each year still makes used EVs an affordable and practical option. The federal government also provides tax rebates on used cars like this one, as well (see energy.gov for details).
If the battery has no issues, the cost of maintenance on an EV will be less. Like my battery powered mower (that I love and have had for 5 years), I never have to change the oil, replace a spark plug, or flush coolant. There is not even a transmission to have issues.
OK, so “the man” will get me on car insurance rates, right? Surprisingly, when I shopped for my car insurance, I found the same coverage that my wife has on her Subaru Forester for less cost (Chevy Bolt cost: $375 per year, Forester cost: $500 per year). The stories that I have heard about EV batteries “blowing up” are mostly just rumors and not affecting insurance costs.
Along with cost, convenience is important to me. Will buying an electric car keep me from driving long trips? My children each live about 120 miles away, well within the 300-mile radius of most EVs. So, I can visit either of my kids in an EV without having to charge until I get back home. My wife and I go on one to two big trips a year. While newer EVs can “super-charge” in less than an hour, my wife and I plan to still use her gas-powered Subaru Forester for these long trips. Having one gas vehicle gives us a lot of flexibility. I am helping the environment with an EV, and not sacrificing convenience much, by having a gas vehicle in our household.
In the end, looking at cost, convenience, and conserving natural resources like fossil fuels, buying an EV was the right decision for me. I hope that this helps you in making balanced decisions that protect our limited resources and your pocketbook.
***
Dean Banziger, M.S. is a mathematics teacher at Williamstown High School.
Posted: January 11, 2025 by main_y0ke11
Climate Corner: Driving a used EV by the numbers
Jan 11, 2025
Jonathan Brier
climatecorner@brierjon.com
In April 2024 I wrote “How my life changed driving a used EV.” It was just over 12 months ago I purchased a used Hyundai Kona Electric with 20,202 miles. A couple weeks before the 12 months mark of ownership, I doubled that number. Most of this is my commute of about 100 miles round trip and a few long trips amounting to 200 to 1,500 miles each. What have I learned from one year of EV ownership?
Cutting to the chase, I am saving money. Somewhere between $500 and $800 compared to my previous car AFTER factoring in the difference in increased insurance and the increased registration fee and estimating an average of $3 per gallon of regular (the U.S. average for that period was $3.49, so this is a conservative). My maintenance costs disappeared except for the $25 for tire rotation; the only liquid to change in my car is battery coolant.
My previous car, a 2006 Toyota Corolla, was reliably getting 32-38 mpg with most of my driving being highway. My EV is getting about 100 mpg (one gallon of gas is about 33.4 kwh). Answering the questions my neighbors and others have asked me:
* How often do I plug-in to charge?
Two days a week at least, the day before I commute 100 miles. It really depends on how much I drive and where I want to go.
* How much does charging cost?
My home electric rate is about $0.16 per kwh with both generation and AEP Ohio’s transmission and distribution charges. On average I drive 1,800 miles a month. In the summer, my car is more efficient and does 100 miles in about 22.2 kwh making recharging $3.56. In the winter, because I have an older EV without a heat pump for heating, I’m losing some additional range to heat my car and the battery is less efficient. In winter, 100 miles when it’s really cold, like below 32 degrees Fahrenheit, my refill would be about 31.25 kwh depending on how I drove. That is $5.
So between $3.56-$5 for my EV for 100 miles, while my Corolla cost between $8.57-$9.38 for the same 100 miles. For 1,800 miles, the Corolla cost $154.26-$168.84 vs. the EV cost of $63.54-$90. I did fast charge with DC, so these are the low end.
When compared to a 2010 Prius hybrid at 50 mpg average, the cost for charging vs. gas is nearly a wash when it was cold in December/January. Warmer months’ travel with an EV is cheaper even with higher rates than home for the fast charging. $0.30-$0.65 per kwh I’ve seen on a trip.
* How long does it take to charge?
When I visit family, I only have access to a 15-amp, 120-volt outlet like in any home. If I’m really low on battery, it may take 24-48 hours to get back to full since that would only add three to five miles per hour. A level 2 charger, aka 240 volts, recharges faster in three to four hours. A DC fast charger on trips will go from 20-80% in 30-50 minutes depending on outside temps. Newer EVs can do this in 15-20 minutes.
There is much outdated information and knowledge on EVs and I can’t get to everything here.
Battery life: Most EV owners won’t ever need to get a battery replacement. Battery management systems have greatly matured, and the chemistry of the batteries is rapidly improving in both safety, density and material needs. They even have life after a vehicle. A startup called Element Energy is using old EV batteries for grid storage. Redwood Materials is claiming 95% efficiency for material recovery when recycling them. The company Recurrent tracks and rates EV battery status for those who opt in or sell EVs, so you know its health.
So, if you’re wondering if you should buy an EV, do the math. It may work out that you can save the green in your wallet and the future of our planet.
***
Jonathan Brier is a Marietta resident, information scientist, data librarian and an Eagle Scout. He is a member of the Association of Computing Machinery, American Association for the Advancement of Science, OpenStreetMap US, Mid-Ohio Valley Climate Action and a Wikipedia contributor. If you would like to reach him, visit https://brierjon.com or email: climatecorner@brierjon.com
Posted: January 8, 2025 by main_y0ke11
Climate Corner: Dollars and (common) sense
Jan 4, 2025
Griffin Bradley
editorial@newsandsentinel.com
With the 2024 elections behind us and a second Trump administration preparing to take control in a few short weeks, I find it to be a time of reflection on the last four years. The good, the bad, and the ugly. Despite the rhetoric around America’s political realities and what the future may hold, we must also look back at the consequential policy of the Biden administration and the indelible impact it had on clean energy and climate.
The 2022 Inflation Reduction Act set a new standard for prioritizing clean energy and climate issues, putting hundreds of billions of dollars toward cleaning up our energy system, stabilizing our aging grid, and more. Over the last four years, America has seen monumental investments in clean energy and climate priorities by the federal government and private businesses alike. Now, with a new administration and a Republican trifecta in Washington, the risk of backtracking on the commitments and progress we have seen across the country is real.
We’ve all heard for months that deficit hawks in Congress look to take a “scalpel, not a sledgehammer” to spending in the next federal budget. This concept begs an overarching question: what gets cut, and who does it impact? Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., has made it clear that he sees IRA funding as a key source of cuts, but little is known on what parts will stay and what parts will go. What we do know, however, is that there remains a strong contingent of Republican House members who support the IRA.
But, wait. Hasn’t one of the key talking points of the Republican Party throughout the last election cycle been that the federal government is wasting taxpayer dollars on “woke” climate issues? Then why have 18 Republicans — a bloc well large enough to tank any initiative of the current five-seat majority — signed a letter stumping for a Biden administration policy?
Well, it turns out that injecting capital into projects that have direct benefits for Americans is a popular endeavor, regardless of what party’s administration made it happen.
Since the passage of the IRA, the lion’s share of funding (nearly 4x) has gone to Republican districts. From EV battery manufacturing in North Carolina to budding energy storage technologies being developed right here in West Virginia, we are seeing an economic renaissance of sorts. Blue collar, hard-working areas of America that have been looking for new opportunities in a new economy have got it, due in no small part to the IRA.
A recent report shows over 3.3 million Americans are employed in the clean energy space as of 2023, a number that has steadily increased since 2020. Beyond federal recognition that clean energy and climate is worth investing in, these burgeoning jobs numbers show that corporate and private-sector entities agree and have doubled down on their commitments to a cleaner world. From the corporations that make many of your household products to the small startups that are on the bleeding edge of technology, there is continued support and ambition tied to investments in climate issues.
While we don’t yet know what is to come for these substantial programs and investments, we have so many examples of the good that federal funding has done, not just for clean energy and climate, but for restoring the economic value of rural America. We have the opportunity to simultaneously lift up broad swaths of our country while also making it a better place for our children, grandchildren and beyond to thrive. So, when the inevitable fight around funding in Washington starts and the IRA is on the chopping block, remember what is really at stake.
This is more than just dollars and cents.
***
Griffin Bradley is a lifelong Wood County resident, graduate of West Virginia University (B.A., Political Science ’21; M.A., Political Science ’23), and a contributing author for Mid-Ohio Valley Climate Action.
Posted: December 28, 2024 by main_y0ke11
Climate Corner: A Challenge and an Opportunity
Dec 28, 2024
Rebecca Phillips
editorial@newsandsentinel.com
2024 has been a year of climate-related disasters. On Dec. 19, Reuters published one photo from each of the countries mentioned in its coverage this year: of the 125 countries, 22, or more than 15%, of the images featured the aftermath of floods, wildfires, hurricanes, droughts, or heat waves, and this in a year that saw political upheavals and wars across the globe. In the United States alone, wildfires burned 8.4 million acres, a million and a half more than the average of the last ten years, which have seen historically high fire numbers. The eighteen named storms of the Atlantic hurricane season devastated places as far from the coast as Asheville, N.C. and, combined, caused $190 billion in damages. Twenty-four of this year’s climate-related events caused more than $1 billion each in damage and resulted in 418 human deaths in just the U.S.
The areas most at risk for property damage and loss of life are those to which Americans have been moving in recent decades, specifically, the South and Southwest. Arizona’s large cities are possible only because of water diversion from the Colorado River, and that river is drying up. Some Phoenix-area developers have been unable to get building permits because there is not enough water available to service the homes they want to build. Many home insurers have stopped writing policies for hurricane-prone areas of Florida, leaving the state the only insurer available, with half a trillion dollars in liabilities. The National Flood Insurance Program was $21 billion dollars in debt, debt for which taxpayers are ultimately responsible, before the damage caused by hurricanes Helene and Milton.
As Scripps Prize-winning journalist Abrahm Lustgarten puts it in his book “On the Move: The Overheating Earth and the Uprooting of America,” “Drought, coastal flooding, crop failures, intensifying hurricanes, extreme heat, and wildfires will begin to overlap and close in on the country from its edges, slowly making entire regions less attractive and even, in some extreme cases, unlivable. … Decades from now, the United States will be wildly different, even unrecognizable.”
These changes may make some currently growing areas less desirable. While the last few decades have seen more people leaving areas like the MOV than moving here, researchers have noticed what may be the beginning of a new pattern of climate migration, people leaving fire-and hurricane-prone areas for safer parts of the country. Many of these migrants have chosen to settle in the so-called Rust Belt, our country’s former industrial heartland. There have recently been numerous conferences and a fair amount of press on the Great Lakes region as a “climate haven,” an area likely to avoid the worst effects of climate change. Universities and think tanks have been exploring how Rust Belt cities can prepare for population gain. Already, Duluth, Minn., markets itself as “climate-proof Duluth” and in the last few years has seen nearly 2,500 new residents from other states, many of them escaping wildfires and high temperatures. This number represents an over 3% increase in its population after decades of decline. Invest Appalachia has issued a report on the central Appalachians, an area that includes the Mid-Ohio Valley, as a region that can absorb climate migrants and revitalize our communities in the process.
Yes, despite the destruction that climate change is wreaking, we can use this challenge to strengthen the communities in our less-climatically-threatened region. Go to nearly any town or city in Ohio or West Virginia and count the empty homes, retail buildings, and former schools.
Many of these are sturdy buildings in established areas, well worth saving if there were people to do so. In addition to physical infrastructure, our region contains close-knit, welcoming communities. Imagine Wood and Washington counties with 7,000 or so additional residents bringing their skills and ideas, easing labor shortages, creating new businesses raising families. This is a possible dream if we prepare for it, as Marietta is doing with the Reimagine Marietta process.
Creating the physical and social infrastructure for a growing rather than a declining region is not an easy task, but a crisis can provide an opportunity. Climate change is almost certain to bring a stormier, hotter, more dangerous world with less land hospitable to human civilization; however, in our region we have the opportunity to grow and strengthen communities that can thrive more than they ever have.
My wish for the New Year.
***
Rebecca Phillips taught research writing at WVU Parkersburg and is a member of Mid-Ohio Valley Climate Action.
Posted: December 21, 2024 by main_y0ke11
Climate Corner: The solstice and our fragile balance
Dec 21, 2024
Jean Ambrose
editorial@newsandsentinel.com
This morning at 4:21 a.m., as most of us in West Virginia were still in bed, the Earth paused. Today marks the winter solstice — the shortest day and longest night of the year in the Northern Hemisphere. At this precise moment, our planet, wobbling on its 23-degree axial tilt, stopped leaning away from the sun and began tilting back toward it. The term “solstice” originates from the Latin solstitium, meaning “sun standing still,” symbolizing this fleeting moment of stillness before the Earth shifts its course.
This axial tilt is vital for life, shaping our seasons and moderating Earth’s temperatures to sustain an extraordinary diversity of organisms, including humans. Ancient cultures, deeply attuned to the seasons, built structures like Stonehenge in England, Machu Picchu in Peru, and the Cahokia mounds in Illinois to track celestial events. These monuments testify to humanity’s deep reliance on nature’s cycles and the celebration of the solstice as a time of balance and renewal.
The winter solstice signifies both an ending and a beginning. While the cold and darkness prevail, Earth’s subtle tilt triggers the first signs of change. Plants and animals begin to respond to the lengthening days, setting the stage for spring’s rebirth. For centuries, cultures have commemorated this turning point with rituals and feasts, emphasizing themes of renewal, community, and the enduring promise of light. These traditions serve as reminders of our shared humanity and connection to the rhythms of nature.
Yet, in our modern lives, we have grown distant from these cycles. This detachment not only weakens our sense of belonging but also harms our stewardship of the planet. While ancient peoples found comfort in the predictability of seasonal patterns, today, human activities are disrupting these natural rhythms. The climate crisis–fueled by deforestation, fossil fuel consumption, and unchecked industrialization–is destabilizing the very cycles we once depended on. Seasons are shifting, temperatures are rising, and ecosystems are under mounting stress.
In its resilience, Earth is attempting to rebalance itself, but the strain caused by humanity’s thoughtless greed is unprecedented. Unchecked pollution, exploitation of natural resources, and rampant greenhouse gas emissions have pushed the planet’s climate systems into disarray. The natural cycles that once ensured stability can no longer be trusted in the same way. This unsettling reality underscores the consequences of prioritizing short-term gains over long-term sustainability. By pushing Earth beyond its limits, we endanger not just the environment but our own future.
The solstice invites us to reflect on the balance between darkness and light, not just in nature but in our relationship with the planet. Reconnecting with the natural world–whether by eating local foods according to the seasons, reducing our carbon footprint, or simply observing the beauty around us — offers a pathway to restore harmony. It reminds us of the intricate web of life we belong to and the responsibility we share to protect it.
As we celebrate the return of the sun, let us also pledge to safeguard the cycles that sustain life. The solstice is more than a moment in time; it is a call to action. Even in the darkest moments, there is potential for renewal and growth. By confronting the climate crisis, we honor the wisdom of the natural world and help secure a brighter, more sustainable future for all.
So when you hang a wreath, let it remind you of the wheel of life. Shut off the electricity and light candles as you feast with friends and family. Appreciate the sun and soil and water that were essential to the food on your table and the contributions of immigrants and marginalized communities who make this abundance possible. Finally, as we gather in our communities, be strengthened in the sure knowledge that we cannot protect our families, our futures, or our planet alone — we will always need each other.
***
Jean Ambrose lives on a ridge near Mountwood Park.
Posted: December 14, 2024 by main_y0ke11
Climate Corner: No peace for Earth
Dec 14, 2024
Aaron Dunbar
editorial@newsandsentinel.com
In October of 1963, Bing Crosby released his iconic rendition of the classic holiday song, “Do You Hear What I Hear?” While the song’s lyrics are in clear reference to the Nativity, it was originally written and composed by the husband and wife duo of Noel Regney and Gloria Shayne, during the time of the Cuban Missile Crisis. Listened to from this perspective, it becomes clear that the mention of stars “with a tail as long as a kite” and pleas to “pray for peace, people everywhere” were a direct response to the very real nuclear fears of the age.
“I had thought I’d never write a Christmas song,” Regney once recounted. “Christmas had become so commercial. But this was the time of the Cuban Missile Crisis. In the studio, the producer was listening to the radio to see if we had been obliterated. En route to my home, I saw two mothers with their babies in strollers. The little angels were looking at each other and smiling. All of a sudden, my mood was extraordinary.”
At the time of its writing, Shayne confessed that the two of them were unable to even fully perform the song themselves due to the emotional intensity of its subject matter. “Our little song broke us up. You must realize there was a threat of war at the time.”
Six decades on, and this haunting holiday tune sadly maintains the same degree of relevance as the day that it was written. Last year on Christmas Day, the birthplace of Christ was literally being bombed with munitions manufactured and provided to Israel by the United States. This year, the same administration perpetrating the genocide in Gaza is doing everything it can to provoke nuclear conflict with Russia on its way out the door, funneling billions in weapons to Ukraine and twisting Volodymyr Zelenskky’s arm to try and lower his country’s draft age to 18. Our tragic failure to learn from history and to insist on imperialist conflict escalation over diplomacy makes a song like “Do You Hear What I Hear?” truly evergreen.
As someone who genuinely loves this time of year, I find myself increasingly shaken by the jarring contrast of the holiday season with the ongoing destruction of our planet, whether through war or environmental catastrophe — or, as is often the case, through the intermingling of both.
It may be that I’m out holiday shopping, my car’s radio tuned in to Christmas carols for the entire month of December, and apropos of nothing I’ll find myself contemplating a near certain future in which the Global North’s consumption of fossil fuels has locked the world into 2C or more of global warming. This in itself would be enough to kill off 99% of the world’s coral reefs, and likely lead to the deaths of more than a billion people — and yet it increasingly seems that this figure is on the low end of what we can expect in years to come.
Walking past a mall Santa, I can’t help but think of the North and South Poles heating faster than anywhere else on the planet, or the Antarctic Doomsday Glacier that’s been melting at an accelerated rate, threatening catastrophic sea level rise.
Santa himself, I’m reminded, was largely popularized in his modern-day form by Coca-Cola, a company which has been named the largest plastic polluter on the planet for some five years in a row at this point. Evidently not satisfied with limiting themselves to a single area of environmental desecration, in 2024 Coke decided to replace their widely celebrated and iconic holiday ads with a series of visually grotesque commercials created through generative AI. This technology, as I detailed in a previous Climate Corner column, is expected to contribute to a doubling of the world’s energy needs by 2026, accelerating the already disastrous rate of global heating while also guzzling down millions of gallons of water, leading to global scarcities of this most vital resource.
It’s strange to me, as well, to watch a nation that proudly labels itself as “Christian,” celebrating the birth of Christ while living as culturally divorced from His teachings as possible. Violence and overconsumption have become our national brand, and we’ve taken to worshiping the corrupt CEOs and arms dealers making billions from the engineering of mass scale human tragedy as their own kinds of messiahs. Jesus, in His teachings, is unmistakable in His condemnation of the rich to the fires of hell, as well as His uplifting of the poor, the meek, and the foreigner upon this earth. Why, then, in 2024, when the chasm between the wealthy and poor has never been greater, when the lies and corruption of the wealthy and those in power have never been of more tragic consequence to the world than they are now, are we taught by our culture to emulate those who have gone completely insane with greed, and to reject the poor, the vulnerable, and those in need from among our number?
Finally, as yet another year of climate inaction draws to a close, I find myself wondering how many “good years” we still have left before things truly start to collapse. Even this, I know, is a privileged notion to entertain, as I lie under warm blankets in a well-heated home, with plenty of food to eat, clean water to drink, and so far mostly insulated from the ravages of the climate crisis, which have already left so many with nothing in this world. I do my best to go about my business, making plans for a future I know the generation of children being born today will likely never have. I read about yet another “hottest year on record” in the books, knowing that this will only be true until next Christmas rolls around.
In spite of all of this, my love for the true spirit of the holidays remains undamped. Noel Regney’s “pray for peace, people everywhere” is a call to action that stays with me year round. Not just to pray for it, but to personally manifest it, and to try to give back whatever amount of light into this ever darkening world that I can.
***
Aaron Dunbar is a member of Mid-Ohio Valley Climate Action.
Posted: December 7, 2024 by main_y0ke11
Appalachian hydrogen hub is a dirty-energy boondoggle that should be canceled
December 6, 2024
Randy Pokladnik
Cleveland.com editorial
In the fall of 2023, the Biden administration’s Department of Energy (DOE) announced a $7 billion investment in seven regional hydrogen hubs, to be financed through the Inflation Reduction Act. One of those hubs, the Appalachian Regional Clean Hydrogen Hub or ARCH2, will receive up to $925 million and see projects spanning the states of Ohio, West Virginia, and Pennsylvania. The future of ARCH2 is uncertain and may be affected by the incoming administration.
After the initial announcements of projects, DOE promised there would be opportunities for community engagement — but that has not happened. The Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations and the DOE held listening sessions about the hub this spring, and on Nov. 7, an open house was held in Dunbar, West Virginia. Open houses scheduled for Ohio and West Virginia have been postponed indefinitely. Very little technical information about the various projects has been released to the public, making it difficult for citizens to engage or comment on projects. As a result, on May 28, over 50 environmental organizations signed a letter created by the Ohio River Valley Institute (ORVI), asking the DOE to suspend negotiations on the Appalachian Regional Clean Hydrogen Hub until more information on the projects was released.
In addition, a recent report by ORVI pointed out that, “Four project development partners have exited ARCH2 and five of the 15 originally proposed projects have been scrubbed.”
Projects still in play in Ohio include: two Plug Power/Amazon facilities, Independence Hydrogen, and the Dominion Energy/Stark Area Regional Transit Authority project. The majority of partners in the ARCH2 hub are fossil fuel corporations or companies with ties to fossil fuels. No renewable energy companies are involved in ARCH2. Any energy used for Plug Power water electrolysis plants will be fossil-fuel-based, as Ohio only produces 4% of its electricity from renewables.
ARCH2′s hydrogen will be “blue hydrogen” — hydrogen collected from fracked methane gas molecules using steam methane reforming. The result will be more dangerous fracking for our communities, more fugitive methane emissions, more water withdrawals, more radioactive brine, more truck traffic, more exposures to carcinogens, and more fracking infrastructure.
The Achilles heel of blue hydrogen is its reliance on carbon-capture-storage technology (CCS) to sequester carbon dioxide and store it in Class VI injection wells. CCS is expensive and ineffective. One example is the Gorgon facility in Australia which operated at a third of its capacity. The pipelines used for CO2 transportation can rupture and release concentrated carbon dioxide, which is an asphyxiant. A pipeline rupture in Satartia, Mississippi injured 45 people.
Hydrogen gas is explosive and highly flammable; can permeate steel as well as plastics; is an indirect greenhouse gas; creates toxic NOx emissions when blended with methane for a fuel; and causes the embrittlement of steel, which would make transportation via existing pipelines problematic.
Economically speaking, hydrogen as an energy carrier is extremely expensive and thus requires significant subsidies. Each time an energy source is converted to another form of energy, energy is lost during the conversion. “It will always be more efficient to rely first on the direct use of renewable electricity wherever it is possible to do so,” argues a 2021 Earthjustice report.
Hydrogen projects globally are seeing a lack of a market, and companies are abandoning new hydrogen projects. The high costs of hydrogen will be passed on to ratepayers and citizens. Why support more extractive industries in our region? Why gamble on there being a long-term market for hydrogen gas? It would make more sense to spend money on safe, affordable energy projects such as wind turbines, solar arrays, energy efficiency, and electrification of transportation.
Anti-fracking activist Randi Pokladnik is a lifelong resident of the Ohio River Valley and a retired Weirton Steel research chemist with a Ph.D. in environmental studies.
Posted: December 7, 2024 by main_y0ke11
Climate Corner: Blooming in an unfavorable climate
Dec 7, 2024
Callie Lyons
editorial@newsandsentinel.com
In the face of a political climate that feels increasingly unfavorable, especially for environmentalists and those advocating for systemic change, it’s easy to feel overwhelmed and hopeless. The challenges–stagnant policies, rising climate impacts, and polarized discourse — can seem insurmountable. Yet, history shows that hope thrives in adversity, and progress often begins with small, focused steps.
Reframing hopelessness into hope starts with the realization that while circumstances may not change overnight, our response to them can. This means mastering the art of blooming where we’re planted, finding opportunities for growth and impact, even in the harshest conditions.
“Bloom where you’re planted” isn’t just a metaphor; it’s a strategy. Environmental advocates, youth activists, and marginalized groups all face unique barriers, yet their stories are filled with examples of persistence leading to progress. Local actions — whether installing solar panels on a school roof, planting community gardens, or enacting green municipal policies — have ripple effects.
When we accept our current position as a starting point, rather than a fixed limitation, we empower ourselves to turn challenges into opportunities for growth.
Change is rarely the work of one person or group — it’s the result of united efforts. Coalitions are essential for achieving progress in tough times. Youth activists partnering with scientists, environmental justice organizations collaborating with healthcare professionals, and faith-based groups joining hands with conservationists show the power of diverse alliances.
Challenges often force us to innovate, and the environmental movement is no stranger to doing more with less. Limited resources, whether time, funding, or political support, can inspire groundbreaking solutions.
This principle applies to personal action, too. You don’t need an unlimited budget to reduce waste, adopt sustainable habits, or educate others about climate issues. Small steps, like hosting a workshop or planting a pollinator garden, can inspire broader action.
At its core, this approach to reframing hopelessness is about rediscovering agency. When challenges feel overwhelming, the antidote lies in identifying what we can do and doing it with purpose. Here are three pillars to keep in mind:
Find Strength in Small Victories
Celebrate and share progress, no matter how modest. Whether it’s a city adopting a renewable energy standard or a community rallying to protect local wetlands, every win fuels the larger fight.
Collaborate Across Divides
Build unexpected alliances. Environmentalists working with businesses, or scientists partnering with religious groups, can create momentum by focusing on common ground.
Embrace a Vision for the Future
Use storytelling and education to paint a vivid picture of what’s possible. Hope isn’t passive–it’s the product of actionable plans and the belief that today’s work can create tomorrow’s change.
Yes, the road ahead is steep, and the challenges are vast. But adversity has always been the proving ground for progress. From the civil rights movement to the environmental victories of the past, history reminds us that persistence, collaboration, and creativity can overcome even the toughest odds.
So, let’s bloom where we’re planted. Let’s build coalitions that amplify our voices and find innovative ways to do more with less. And above all, let’s replace hopelessness with a hope grounded in action–a hope that fuels us to create the change we desperately need.
The future is unwritten, but it is not without authors. Together, we can write a story of resilience, collaboration, and hope. Let’s get to work.
***
Callie Lyons is a journalist, researcher and author who works for FITSNews. Her 2007 book “Stain-Resistant, Nonstick, Waterproof and Lethal: The Hidden Dangers of C8,” was the first to cover forever chemicals and their impact on communities — a story later told in the movie “Dark Waters.” Her investigative work has been featured in media outlets, publications, and documentaries all over the world. Lyons also appears in “Citizen Sleuth” — a 2023 documentary exploring the genre of true crime.
Posted: November 30, 2024 by main_y0ke11
Climate Corner: COP(out)29
Nov 30, 2024
Giulia Mannarino
editorial@newsandsentinel.com
The United Nations Security Council is the only organ of the United Nations that has the power to make decisions that member states are obligated to implement. Their five permanent members have veto power and are China, France, the Russian Federation, the United Kingdom and Northern Ireland and the United States. There also are ten non-permanent members which are elected each year for a two year term by the U.N. General Assembly. The Presidency of the Security Council rotates monthly among the members. The United Nations Secretary-General is appointed by the Security Council. That individual is the chief administrative officer of the U.N. and has many responsibilities including heading the Secretariat, the part of the U.N. that carries out the organization’s programs, policies and day-to-day work. The UNSG is expected to advocate for all the world’s people, especially the poor and vulnerable. UNSGs serve a five-year term and can be re-appointed for a second five-year term. There is no limit to the number of terms a UNSG can serve; however, no one has held the office for more than two terms.
In the context of the U.N., “COP” stands for “Conference of Parties.” It refers to the 198 parties that have ratified the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. This includes 197 countries plus the European Union and constitutes near universal membership. The host country of the COP rotates among the five U.N. regional groups with regional group members determining which country from their region will make an offer to host. Preventing “dangerous” human interference with the climate system is the main aim of the UNFCCC. Their conferences, held yearly, are the world’s only multilateral decision-making forum on climate change. The group reviews progress made toward goals and discusses and determines further actions to address the crisis of global warming.
The first COP was held in 1995 in Berlin, Germany. The last three COPs have been held in countries considered major fossil fuel producers; Egypt (COP27), United Arab Emirates (COP28) and most recently Azerbaijan (COP29), raising concerns about a conflict of interest.
These host nations can prioritize their fossil fuel interests over strong climate action, potentially allowing fossil fuel lobbyists significant influence during the negotiations. In fact, COP29 opened with a minister’s defense of fossil fuels and 1,880 fossil fuel industry lobbyists attended. This number exceeds the number of delegates attending for each of the five permanent member nations of the Security Council (China — 969, France — 649, Russian Federation — 900, United Kingdom — 470, USA — 405). COP29, originally scheduled for 12 days, was extended to finalize critical but chaotic negotiations especially concerning the amount of funding for a “Loss and Damages Fund” that came out of COP28. These funds are to be paid by countries and corporations that have caused the problem to help the undeveloped countries that have been impacted. But the final amount approved was inadequate and will not be disbursed for years. Other issues not resolved were postponed to be taken up next year.
The ninth and current UNSG is Antonio Guterres who took office in January 2017 and was re-appointed to a second term. Guterres was born in Lisbon, Portugal and graduated from the Instituto Superior Tecnico with an engineering degree. He has served in Portugal’s Parliament as well as its Prime Minister and as U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees. Guterres, who is fluent in four languages, has made over a hundred speeches about the climate emergency and has regularly called out governments and companies for adding “fuel to the flames of climate change.” Many of his speeches can be viewed on YouTube. His message is that countries must find the will to address the threat of global warming. He has emphasized that 1.5 degrees C is an important tipping point and the need for action to prevent it is unprecedented. Guterres often emphasizes the fact that those least responsible for the problem are hardest hit by the consequences. He believes it is not too late to take action but that it will require maximum global cooperation. A speech he delivered June 5, 2024, titled:“Special Address on Climate Action: A Moment Of Truth,” includes a doable global climate action plan. Guterres’s command of the English language is excellent, but his accent, at least to my ears, seems to mispronounce the word “fuel” as “fool.” It is unintentional, but entertaining and seems accurate.
***
Giulia Mannarino of Belleville, is a grandmother concerned about her two granddaughters’ futures and a member of Mid-Ohio Valley Climate Action.
Find Mid-Ohio Valley Climate Action on the following social media:
Check out our Facebook group and join a conversation
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Archives
Categories
Meta