Dec 25, 2021
Aaron Dunbar
editorial@newsandsentinel.com
“Make no mistake: no military on the face of the earth works harder to avoid civilian casualties than the U.S. military.”
These were the words of Pentagon Press Secretary John Kirby after a U.S. drone strike killed Zemari Ahmadi, age 43; his children Zamir (age 20), Faisal (age 16), and Farzad (age 10); his relative Ahmad Naser (age 30); three of his nephews, Benjamin (age 6), Arwin (age 7), and Hayat (age 2); and two girls, Somaya (age 3) and Malika (age 3.)
A family of civilians, and U.S. allies at that, mistaken for Islamic State operatives and murdered by our government for the unforgivable crime of loading bottles of water into their Toyota Corolla, and looking a little bit too much like terrorists hauling bombs from a height of thousands of feet in the air.
Ramin Yousafi, a relative of those murdered, reported that “They are so burned out we cannot identify their bodies, their faces.”
U.S. Central Command went on to lie about “successfully hitting” their target and that it had “no indication” of civilian casualties, and would likely have maintained this line had it not been for in-depth reporting from the New York Times and the Washington Post, providing evidence to the contrary.
The Pentagon, in what was surely an impartial investigation of their own mass slaughter of children, later reported that “no violation of law, including the Law of War,” had taken place.
The only inference one can possibly make from this conclusion, that no one at all is to be held accountable for the horrific aerial murder of ten civilians and seven children, is that the war machine is functioning exactly as it should be.
These frequent incidents of mass civilian casualties are not a bug, but a feature.
Just days ago, the New York Times reported that a top-secret U.S. military unit known as “Talon Anvil” repeatedly and knowingly ignored safeguards by striking human population centers in Syria, killing farmers in their fields, children playing in the streets, and civilians attempting to take refuge from the fighting. The unit’s horrific actions were reported to superiors up the chain of command, but were routinely ignored.
Astonishingly, military officials have explicitly said that they refuse to do body counts of civilians killed by our armed forces. Indeed, our government seems far more interested in punishing those who expose the slaughter of innocents than reprimanding those war criminals actually responsible for the carnage.
Air Force veteran Daniel Hale, who leaked classified documents revealing a list of civilian casualties that would constitute multiple war crimes if proven, is currently languishing in a federal prison for revealing the truth. The CIA, meanwhile, actively plotted to assassinate journalist Julian Assange under the Trump administration, for his role in exposing war crimes in Iraq.
In 2022, the United States will spend $768.2 billion on its so-called national defense, more than the next eleven countries combined. With this grotesque sum of money we fund a globe-spanning death squad responsible for the indiscriminate destruction of human life, which answers neither to the taxpayers who fund it, nor seemingly to any actual governing body whatsoever.
It is absolutely infuriating to watch as our planet falls apart due to runaway anthropogenic climate change, and incorrigible corporate hacks like Joe Manchin weep crocodile tears about how we’re spending entirely too much money on trying to keep the human race from extinction. Meanwhile, he and every other politician in the country, save the most outspoken “radical” leftists and the occasional stopped-clock libertarian, are more than happy to continue writing out blank checks to the Pentagon to engage in endless, mindless bloodshed around the world, carrying out their profitable forever wars with absolutely no one holding them accountable for their actions.
Not only does our out-of-control military rob the nation of crucial resources that are desperately needed to combat the climate crisis, but their actions themselves contribute horrendously to global heating.
The Pentagon is among the largest polluters in history, with its emissions surpassing as many as 140 entire countries. If our military were its own nation, it would be the 47th largest emitter in the world based solely on its fuel usage. Last month, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was confronted with these facts by a climate change activist at COP26, over her support for increasing the U.S. military budget.
“National security advisors all tell us that the climate crisis is a national security matter,” Pelosi replied, going on to mention the threat of “migration,” with the implication that our military will be essential in abusing the climate refugees we’re directly responsible for displacing.
The logic on display here is mind-boggling, and tracks perfectly with America’s long, bloody tradition of forever wars. Essentially, the Pentagon pursues its “interests” around the globe and destabilizes region after region, creating a multitude of threats in its wake and then justifying its continued, bloated existence by claiming that it’s necessary in order to combat the very threats it helped to manifest. The playbook here is perfectly identical with regard to climate change, justifying runaway military spending to combat climate threats, even as our military’s actions directly produce those threats by playing an outsized role in the heating of our planet.
It’s been a common refrain among climate change activists that we need a “World War II-sized public response” to adequately counteract the climate crisis.
In today’s dollars, the United States spent about $4.1 trillion in the Second World War. Assuming my back-of-the-envelope math is correct, this means that in the past six years alone, we’ve spent about as much money on our military as we did during all of World War II. The amount being proposed for climate spending in President Biden’s Build Back Better program (which is already laughably small and woefully inadequate) is hardly even a fraction of what we waste on our military over the same period of time, yet lawmakers across the political spectrum treat it like some exorbitant pork spending that will lead us to financial ruin.
We simply cannot go on like this any longer.
In the lasting words of President Eisenhower, “Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed.”
Our bloodthirsty addiction to war cannot be sustained any longer. If Americans want any kind of decent future for their children on this planet, then they must make a crucial decision in 2022 and the years to come: their war machine, or the world.
***
Aaron Dunbar is a member of Mid-Ohio Valley Climate Action.
Last Updated: April 28, 2023 by main_y0ke11
Climate Corner: Not all West Virginians are Manchin fans
Jan 29, 2022
Eric Engle
editorial@newsandsentinel.com
In a recent edition of The Charleston Gazette-Mail, President of the West Virginia Manufacturer’s Association Rebecca McPhail, stated “People outside our great state are entitled to their own opinions, but here in West Virginia we know Joe Manchin and we’re grateful for him.” How very presumptuous of Ms. McPhail to speak for all West Virginians. And how very thoughtful of her (sarcasm intended) to declare that the rest of the country are entitled to their own opinions about a Senator whose egotistical obstruction of extremely popular and crucial legislation directly and negatively impacts their lives.
The audacity of the fossil fuels and chemical industries in West Virginia and their lobbyists and representatives in our state legislature never ceases to amaze me. No price is too high for energy consumers to pay to keep burning coal. Cleaning up after coal, oil and gas is the taxpayer’s responsibility in West Virginia, not the responsibility of these profitable industries. Make utilities compete in open markets? Not in West Virginia. Pursue environmental justice initiatives for low-income communities and communities of color disproportionally harmed by pollution like ethylene oxide? Maybe the state Department of Environmental Protection will get around to it, but they’ll probably just hold more meetings where folks can share their trauma from this exposure and then go back to giving polluting industry whatever it wants and occasionally issuing fines that polluting industry considers the cost of doing business. Regulatory capture in this state is a given.
If these folks are not “married to the mineral,” as so many of them like to say, and they just care about miners and power plant workers and local tax revenues, how about they pass policy, create regulations and make investments that will make a tangible difference in the lives of the people of this state given the inevitable decline of finite fossils? Not only must we dramatically reduce CO2 and equivalent greenhouse gas emissions in the next decade to preserve the most stable global climate system we possibly can, but fossil fuels cannot compete with renewable energy and storage indefinitely without massive amounts of public subsidy and favorable treatment.
A study by the International Monetary Fund found that $5.2 trillion was spent globally on fossil fuel subsidies in 2017, and an analysis by Simon Buckle, the head of the climate change, biodiversity and water division at the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, found that the $649 billion the U.S. spent on fossil fuels subsidies in 2015 was more than the country’s defense budget and 10 times the federal spending for education.
Another example of how ridiculous our legislature can be when it comes to the fossil fuels industry can be found in the current legislative session. The West Virginia State Senate wants to set up a private, nonstock mining mutual insurance company funded by $50 million from Department of Environmental Protection-specified funds meant to ensure that state mine cleanup funds don’t become more insolvent. The DEP, however, has testified that it has no idea where that $50 million is going to come from. A recent piece on this proposed legislation by Charleston Gazette reporter Mike Tony quotes Sierra Club Senior Attorney Peter Morgan as saying, “It’s hard for me to see that as anything other than a way to lose $50 million of West Virginia’s money because given what’s happening with the coal mining industry, anyone who issues those sorts of bonds is going to have to pay out the full value of those bonds, and that’s going to quickly deplete the $50 million and any additional money the state might put into that.”
No, Ms. McPhail, not all of us West Virginians are grateful for Sen. Joe Manchin III–a man who has placed the profits he makes from the coal brokerage he founded, held in a not-so-blind trust run by his son, over the well-being of the Mountain State. Thousands of us have begged and pleaded with Joe to care more about the people of this state than about his yacht in the Potomac and his Maserati, but he doesn’t want to hear it. The corporate and industry largesse pouring into his future campaign coffers and the attention he’s getting to feed his narcissistic megalomania is just too good for those dopamine receptors in his brain. Maybe one day West Virginia will be able to thrive in a 21st Century economy, but not until the insatiable appetite for destruction of the industries of the past has been either forcefully curbed or sated.
***
Eric Engle is chairman of Mid-Ohio Valley Climate Action.
Last Updated: April 28, 2023 by main_y0ke11
Habitat
Jan 31, 2022
Vic Elam
Letter to the Editor Marietta Times
Often referred to in terms of the wildlife needs of shelter, water, food, and space, habitat also applies to humans. In ecological terms habitat is often defined as an assemblage of animals and plants that live in a particular environment.
Without proper habitat we will cease to exist, and one irreplaceable component of our habitat is water. Humans have an advantage over the assemblage of animals and plants that coexist and make it possible for us to live. We can normally take contaminated water that would make us extremely ill and filter it and treat it and render it harmless and even make it life sustaining.
I say normally because we usually start out with water that is relatively clean. But the fate of our water supply is constantly under attack from threats from contamination and usually those threats are unforeseen and accidental. We take clean drinking water for granted whereas many parts of the world would be thankful to have our water supply.
To paraphrase a great adage, “With great gifts comes great responsibility” and we are not taking the precautions needed to protect our water. Of the many threats out there, we as humans allow ourselves to remove millions of gallons of perfectly good water from the environment and contaminate it by pumping it under ground through rock fissures (fracking) where it picks up radiation and multitudes of harmful compounds. When this water comes back to the surface it is a biohazard, although the petroleum industry has used its power to avoid that label and instead refers to it as “brine”.
Humans are great at problem solving, but when there is financial incentive, it seems that solutions often impact those that are unaware or without the wherewithal to protect themselves. Certainly, the other part of our habitat, the assemblage of animals and plants are powerless to defend themselves.
Apparently the cheapest and easiest disposal method is to inject the “brine” down wells. This disposal method is fraught with potential for environmental harm, most troubling is the threat of water contamination. These injection wells are drilled to depths well below our drinking water sources, but there are many pathways where the brine can find its way into the water supply. Trucks carrying the “brine” can wreck and spill, pipelines that carry “brine” to the well site can rupture and spill as happened near Marietta last year, injection wells can leak, injection wells under pressure can force “brine” through fissures to unplanned places, etc.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is authorized to provide oversight on these injection wells and delegates that role to the Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Oil and Gas Resources Management (ODNR). ODNR has regularly failed to complete inspections as required by USEPA and penalties for violations are rare or absent. Inspection authority should be taken away from ODNR, who receives payment for each barrel of injected “brine”. Secondly, if we have not learned anything from the mining industry it’s that we should have plenty of revenue set aside for reclamation. Currently, there is no surcharge or tax per barrel of “brine” disposed to go into a fund set aside for when something goes wrong. Perhaps the counties should impose a fee or tax to collect funds for reclamation, although this is a Genie that will be very hard to put back in the bottle.
I hope that we all can continue to take for granted the abundant clean water that we enjoy and the full compliment of animals and plants that come with it. Vigilance will be required to ensure that these benefits are protected.
Last Updated: April 28, 2023 by main_y0ke11
Climate Corner: Economics, energy and employment
Jan 22, 2022
George Banziger
editorial@newsandsentinel.com
There are certain demographic and economic trends that have been evident for decades in this region of Appalachia and that can be addressed given the opportunities presented by the investment of federal funds now available. Included in these problems are:
* The continued inexorable pattern of population decline and aging (due to many young people leaving the area)
* Relative to the U.S., the region’s high poverty rate, high unemployment, and low wages
* Corporations headquartered elsewhere, draining wealth from the region
* Coal companies having left their mark
* The region’s high opioid abuse and addiction problems
* Limited broadband access in rural parts of the county.
People in the Mid-Ohio Valley have accepted on faith that the oil and gas industry contributes to the health of the economy in the region. For many years there has been an unfulfilled promise that fossil fuels, particularly shale gas, would enhance the economy of the region and provide jobs. Hydraulic fracturing of natural gas has established well pads, pipelines, processing facilities, and other infrastructure. According to a study by the Ohio River Valley Institute (2021), the shale gas region comprises about 22 counties in Pennsylvania, Ohio, and West Virginia; these counties produce about 90% of the gas of the region yet the region trails the nation on key measures of economic prosperity. For example, jobs increased by just 1.6% in the region compared to 8% nationally; the region lost approximately 37,000 residents, while the U.S population grew by 18% in the past decade. Little of the profit from oil and gas has entered the local economy; trained workers and service providers are generally from outside the area. Royalties for local families with mineral rights have declined with lower natural gas prices. The oil and gas industry is capital intensive, not labor intensive, and the revenue from local natural resources is not returning to the Mid-Ohio Valley. Oil and gas companies should at least be contributing to the local economy through severance taxes, impact fees, and other revenue-generating opportunities that will stay here, benefiting our region.
The fossil-fuel industry has enjoyed a myriad of federal subsidies, which has given it an unfair advantage in the energy market. Evangelical climate scientist, Dr Katherine Hayhoe, in her recent book, “Saving Us,” has written that these subsidies amount to $600 billion per year and include tax breaks, direct production subsidies, and leases on public lands that are far below market rates. It is time for the federal government to support renewable energy, which is safer, better for the environment, and more supportive of sustainable job growth and economic development than fossil fuels.
Many individuals and organizations have seen the handwriting on the wall and are divesting their interests in fossil fuels. Dr. Hayhoe, has cited these facts related to divestment: over 1,300 organizations and 60,000 individuals representing about $14 trillion of assets have made the decision to divest in fossil fuels. These organizations include pension funds and insurance companies, which are reluctant to support an industry that is the direct cause of global warming and extreme weather that results in damage and loss claims in the billions. Banks and investment companies are joining this movement; Goldman Sachs announced recently that it is no longer going to invest in Arctic oil exploration.
An alternative to continued reliance on the oil and gas industry for economic development is to reimagine this region and seek growth opportunities of the 21st Century. A study by UMass-Amherst has reported that good jobs in renewable energy could employ 250,000 in the region in the next 10 years! These opportunities are numerous and include the following:
* Repairing the damage done by extractive industries, e.g., plugging orphaned oil and gas wells, repairing leaks, repairing dams and levies
* Modernizing the electric grid
* Developing new locally based manufacturing of solar-panel and wind-turbine parts
* Expanding manufacturing with energy-efficient facilities, e.g., repurposing coal-fired power plants
* Building sustainable transportation, e.g., railways and electric vehicle infrastructure
* Re-establishing the Civilian Conservation Corps (first created by FDR in the 1930s) for projects that might include carbon farming, and expanding forests and wetlands, which could in turn create job opportunities for recovering opioid addicts.
The American Rescue Plan and the Bipartisan Infrastructure Deal (Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act), which have both been passed by Congress can provide resources for this re-imagining of Appalachia–if local officials will make the asks. The Build Back Better plan, if it is finally passed in some different form from its current version or in separated packages, can provide even more resources for this purpose.
There are 21,000 fewer jobs in the fossil fuel industry –half need re-training and re-employment. These are challenges that can be addressed by educational institutions and employee-training programs in the region.
***
George Banziger, Ph..D., was a faculty member at Marietta College and an academic dean at three other colleges. Now retired, he is a volunteer for the Mid-Ohio Valley Interfaith, and Harvest of Hope. He is a member of the Green Sanctuary Committee of the First Unitarian Universalist Society of Marietta, Citizens Climate Lobby, and of the Mid-Ohio Valley Climate Action team.
Last Updated: April 28, 2023 by main_y0ke11
We can all make a difference in the world
Jan 19, 2022
In the Bargain Hunter
Dr. Randi Pokladnik
Seven years ago this month, I started writing columns for the Bargain Hunter. My very first column was about the chemicals in foods.
For the past seven years I’ve tried to make each column an informative fact-based piece with topics that are important to readers. It often takes several days to get a column ready. I access peer reviewed data and seek out sources and quotes for most of the columns. As a scientist, I deal in facts, not fluff.
During these many years I have had positive feedback from readers and have made many new friends. As much as I have educated my audience, you have educated me.
I remember getting two phone calls from readers about the use of leg-hold traps for bobcats. After investigating, I wrote about the issue and testified at the public hearing in Columbus. The hearing was heavily attended and thankfully the use of these horrendous traps was denied.
As a former teacher, the column became a way for me to educate readers about issues that are very significant in their lives. My students have often told me my knack of simplifying complex scientific topics was my best asset.
I am a nerd, I love science. Sadly, I see our nation becoming less and less science literate, and I worry how the next generation will deal with complex issues that require science literacy.
Some of the many topics discussed during the years include: the value of hemp, the dangers of PFAS (Teflon component), the risks of sun exposure, my trip to see the total eclipse, renewable energy, the benefits of forests, organic farming, and the health benefits of berries.
I have tackled other topics, some local and some national, many that involve legislation. I find the lack of public participation in the political realm of our nation disturbing. By discussing some of these laws, especially those targeting science-related topics, I hoped to encourage more public participation.
I’ve been an environmentalist most of my life. From the time I first read “Silent Spring” and saw the Cuyahoga River catch fire, I knew this was my path in life.
I make no apologies for my columns. I continue to believe the climate crisis is the most crucial issue of our lives. Afterall, it we don’t have a livable planet what does it matter if we have a designer handbag or a new SUV?
But the human race is good at lying. We lie to ourselves that humans aren’t the problem. We lie to ourselves that we don’t really need to change our unsustainable lifestyles to save the planet. We lie to ourselves that technology will save us. We lie to ourselves that we’d do anything for our kids; anything except address the climate crisis. And of course, our media lies to us all by omission.
Avoiding the topic of climate change will not make the carbon dioxide levels drop. However, an email statement forwarded to me this week, written by senior management of the Bargain Hunter said, “Our management and advertising partners would like to see our publications avoid politics (especially state/national), environmental commentary, abortion, and other hot topics – which in the end doesn’t translate well to Randi’s typical content.”
In essence, the very topic that is by far the most important in the history of the planet, the topic that we can no longer afford to ignore, is now to be “avoided.” Why is climate change a disturbing topic for the “management and advertising”?
I am not a fan of censorship, so sadly this will be my last column. I will continue to speak truth to power on other platforms of social media. I will miss the opportunity to reach out to my readers and share the research on these timely topics.
Remember, we can all make a difference in the world, don’t let anyone tell you otherwise. As Margaret Mead said, “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful committed individuals can change the world. In fact, it’s the only thing that ever has.”
Last Updated: April 28, 2023 by main_y0ke11
Climate Corner: Billionaires won’t save us
Jan 15, 2022
Aaron Dunbar
editorial@newsandsentinel.com
“Amazon won’t let us leave”
Last month, these became the final words sent by warehouse worker Larry Virden to his girlfriend Cherie Jones, when a monster tornado collapsed an Amazon warehouse facility in Edwardsville, Ill.
“I know it’s the weekend and Amazon was busy blasting Michael Strahan and other wealthy people into space but can we get any kind of statement about the ‘mass casualty incident’ in Illinois,” an Amazon employee is reported by The Intercept to have complained on a “Voice of Associates” message board shortly thereafter.
“I have been here six and a half years and have never once been involved in a tornado safety drill on my shift,” wrote another employee, “as well as have not taken part in a fire safety drill in about two years,”
A number of Amazon workers have since reported that they are unaware of what they should do in the event of an emergency, while others have stated that Amazon outright discourages them from fleeing natural disasters altogether.
Though to call such storms as the ones that ripped through the Midwest last December “natural” may not be entirely accurate.
“Make no mistake,” said renowned climatologist Michael Mann shortly after the tragic storms in question, “we have been seeing an increase in these massive tornado outbreaks that can be attributed to the warming of the planet.”
Amazon founder and space cowboy Jeff Bezos had made headlines only a month previously following the ascent of his Blue Origin not-actual-spacecraft, which he claimed opened his eyes to the seriousness and enormity of the climate crisis.
During a late July flight, Bezos was noted for thanking “every Amazon employee and every Amazon customer, because you guys paid for all this.” His workforce do indeed seem to be paying for it with their health, safety, and lives, and if his commitment to the betterment of the planet is at all comparable to the gratitude he extends to his employees, one might reasonably suppose that we’d be better off without it.
Some time ago I came across a definition of capitalism that framed it not merely as a system of economics, but as its own form of religion, and I’ve come to realize how well that explains the present state of our crumbling empire.
Capitalism is treated not as a narrative we’ve created for ourselves, but as a system of indisputable laws about how the world should and must work. And when the facts don’t conform to the narrative we’ve established for ourselves, we decide that the problem must be with the reality we perceive, and not with the structure into which we’ve tried and failed to place it.
This religious understanding of capitalism may also help us to understand our obsession with seeking messianic figures from among the billionaire class- those individuals who have essentially “won” capitalism and now rise above us all to save humanity- despite the fact that such figures are almost invariably agents of the destruction they claim to be saving us from.
In February 2021, Bill Gates published “How to Avoid a Climate Disaster.” There was much chatter about this book among the environmentalist community, with some considering Gates to be one of the “good billionaires” who could help lead the charge on fixing the climate crisis.
Suffice it to say, I was far from persuaded.
I will admit the possibility that it was stubbornness on my part as much as anything, but I refused to read Gates’ book out of principle. The Microsoft billionaire is in no way qualified to be the expert on the climate crisis that the gushing press had tried to make him out to be – the only actual qualifications he has in playing such an outsized role in deciding the fate of our planet is his grotesque amount of wealth, which really isn’t a qualification at all.
I felt rather vindicated in my distrust of Gates after it was made public he’d befriended then-convicted child sex trafficker Jeffery Epstein in the hopes of securing a Nobel Peace Prize; and even more so when he began publicly denouncing the easing of patent protections on the COVID-19 vaccine for poorer nations, ensuring more mass death and suffering around the world for the sake of big pharma profits.
Interestingly for someone who claims to want to save the planet, The Bill and Melinda Gates foundation held almost a billion and a half dollars in fossil fuel investments up through 2015. Gates has shot down the practice of fossil fuel divestment as being pointless, while incidentally having had massive sums of his own money invested in heavily polluting industries, at least up until very recently.
Gates has, furthermore, been nothing but complimentary toward the rightwing billionaire Charles Koch, who’s spent decades now obliterating climate policy and corrupting our democracy into something unrecognizable; in addition to being a proponent of (and funding) very dangerous, very inadvisable geoengineering technology such as sun-dimming aerosols.
So okay. Maybe Bill Gates is no climate messiah after all, but something of a false prophet, as it were.
But what about other so-called “good billionaires,” such as Berkshire Hathaway CEO Warren Buffett?
Last May, Buffett rejected a shareholder resolution that would push his conglomerate to inform investors about climate risks. When asked whether he thought fossil fuel companies should be held responsible for destroying the planet, Buffett’s response was “Believe me, Chevron is not an evil company.”
I would like to point out here that human rights lawyer Steven Donziger has been hopping between house arrest and prison since 2019 for his role in helping the Indigenous people of Ecuador win a $9.5 billion settlement from Chevron over the toxic devastation of the Lago Agrio oil field- an amount which Chevron has outright refused to pay.
And then of course there’s Elon Musk, the future God Emperor of Mars, who gives lip service to the urgency of the climate crisis while donating massive amounts of money to Republican politicians, opposing increased taxes on billionaires such as himself that would help pay for crucial climate programs, and telling people not to “worry too much about methane,” despite it being 25 times as strong as carbon dioxide at trapping heat, and making up 20% of global greenhouse gas emissions.
At the end of the day, we desperately need to face the fact that no benevolent billionaire is going to save us from the climate crisis. Capitalism’s gold medalists have gotten where they are by mastering a system that is explicitly designed to exploit and destroy the very planet they now want to play-act at saving. They are obsessed with the notion of infinite growth on a finite planet with a limited carrying capacity, and cannot fathom a way forward beyond doing exactly what it was that got us here in the first place, but with an “eco-friendly” label slapped haphazardly onto the surface.
The fate of all human civilization should not fall into the hands of a half-dozen Silicon Valley tech bros to decide. This world belongs to all of us (although I could frankly care less what Musk and his colony of starving indentured servants decide to do with the frozen hellscape of Mars), and it’s well past time for everyday people to reclaim their future from the greedy, grabbing hands of these corrupt, self-aggrandizing oligarchs.
***
Aaron Dunbar is a member of Mid-Ohio Valley Climate Action.
Last Updated: April 28, 2023 by main_y0ke11
Stop issuing fracking permits
Letters to the Editor Marietta Times
Jan 10, 2022
Maggie Meyer
I am a life-long resident of Appalachia. I grew up in West Virginia and for twenty years I have lived in beautiful Marietta, enjoying the local parks and walking them. That love of nature has been threatened by the fracking industry. For the past few years, every time I travel Third Street, I have encountered more and more tanker trucks. That got me to start asking questions and doing research, which became very troubling.
As I am sure most of you know, all those trucks are carrying waste from the fracking industry, called brine. Fracking is “a process that injects liquid at high pressure into subterranean rocks, boreholes, etc. so as to force open existing fissures and extract oil or gas,” according to the Oxford Dictionary. What is most disturbing about this waste is that most is not only radioactive but also contains lead, arsenic, formaldehyde and mercury. Even though that’s only one percent of this in fracking waste, that’s one percent of, for example, the 1.9 million barrels of brine waste injected into waste wells in Washington County in 2011. Even more troubling, in 2019, Washington County had the second highest level of injection well activity in the state.
One dangerous effect is the threat brine poses to our drinking water. According to Consumer Reports (December 3, 2020), brine “can contaminate [water] supplies when waste spills from trucks or pipelines moving it or when waste leaks from unlined disposal pits.” In fact, there was a spill of brine waste just outside of Marietta in January of 2021 at a pipeline owned by Deep Rock Disposal.
Making matters even worse, the Ohio Legislature passed two bills which now allow for 333 times the radioactive brine waste recommended by health experts. Given this threat not only to our environment but to our health, it is imperative that we as residents of this county strongly urge the Ohio Department of Natural Resources at least to stop issuing permits in Washington County until injection wells are better monitored and until our drinking water can be guaranteed to be safe from these contaminants.
Margaret Meyer
Last Updated: April 28, 2023 by main_y0ke11
Climate Corner: Tar Sands oil extraction continues to threaten climate
Jan 8, 2022
Randi Pokladnik
editorial@newsandsentinel.com
When President Biden revoked the permit of the Keystone XL Pipeline in January 2021, he stated, “permitting the pipeline would undermine U.S. climate leadership by undercutting the credibility and influence of the United States in urging other countries to take ambitious climate action.” The 1,700-mile pipeline would have carried roughly 800,000 barrels of tar sands oil a day from Alberta, Canada, to the Texas Gulf Coast, with the potential to pollute ecosystems, negatively impact health, and become a major contributor to climate change. It would also pose a major threat to the Ogallala Aquifer, one of the world’s largest aquifers.
However, in October 2021, the Biden administration shocked the environmental community by giving a green light to the Enbridge 3 pipeline. This pipeline, like the Keystone KL pipeline, will carry about a million barrels a day of the dirty fuel. As it travels from Alberta, Canada, to Superior, Wisc., it will cross 227 lakes, rivers and streams, including the Mississippi River. It bisects the state of Minnesota and cuts across treaty land.
I have many fond memories of times spent in Minnesota with my husband’s family. Both his mother and father were born in the state and we frequently visited the small towns of Brainard, Little Falls, and Foley, all located just south of the Enbridge 3 pipeline. Now the region has become a hotbed of controversy as indigenous people clash with a Canadian company determined to transport tar sands oil across the state.
The pipeline violates the land treaty rights of the Anishinaabe peoples, threatens the culturally significant wild rice, and contributes more to climate change than the entire economy of Minnesota. It is expected to add 50 coal power plants’ worth of carbon to the atmosphere each year.
Among the nearly 1,000 water protectors arrested in the past year are three grandmothers from the Athens, Ohio, area. Peaceful indigenous protestors were blasted with sand, harassed by pipeline workers, and confronted by police outfitted in riot gear; $2 million worth purchased by the Enbridge company.
What exactly are “tar sands oils?” They are a mixture of sand, clay, water and a thick tar-like substance called bitumen. The bitumen is made up of hydrocarbon molecules, which can be used to make fuels and other petroleum-based products. The world’s largest deposits of tar sands are found in Alberta, Canada, near Athabasca, Cold Lake, and Peace River. There are two ways in which the tar-like bitumen can be extracted from the mixture; open-pit mining and in-situ drilling.
In order to open-pit mine, the forested land must be cleared. Top soil and shale strata are then removed (to depths of up to 300 feet) to reach the tar sand. The tar sand mixture is then removed and hauled to facilities where it is thinned out by combining it with large amounts of water. This slurry is then taken to facilities to extract the bitumen. Less than 20% of the tar sands reserves can be open-pit mined, which employs massive machines to dig up soil and load it into dump trucks the size of houses. For every barrel of oil produced, four tons of earth are excavated.
In an in-situ drilling operation, multiple wells are drilled and steam is pumped underground to liquify the bitumen for pumping and transport. In-situ mining is less damaging to the environment according to the Canadian Association of Petroleum and 80% of the tar sands can be accessed in this manner. But in 2011, in-situ tar sand companies used 370 million cubic meters of fresh water from the Athabasca River alone, more water than the city of Toronto, Canada, used that year.
Regardless of the technique used, it takes large quantities of energy to access tar sands oil. Approximately 14-25% of the energy obtained from tar sands is lost through processing compared to 4% for conventional oil drilling processes.
Like any fossil fuel, tar sands oil destroys air, water, and land, as it is extracted and refined for use. Tar sands oil is thicker, more acidic, and more corrosive than conventional oil. This means that pipelines carrying it are more likely to corrode and leak oil. Since 2010, the original TransCanada Keystone pipeline has leaked over a dozen times and in 2019, spilled 378,000 gallons of tar sands oil in North Dakota. An internal study by TC Energy revealed that pipe stored outside for long periods of time causes anti-corrosion coatings to fail.
Other problems occur when tar sands oil spills out of pipelines as it did in July 2010, when the Enbridge-owned pipeline leaked bitumen into the Kalamazoo River in Michigan. Because the oil contains heavier elements, it sinks to the bottom of water, which makes it more difficult to recover it from the environment.
Tar sands oil is extremely capital intensive and today, many investors are questioning dumping billions into tar sands development when much of the world is turning away from fossil fuels and toward more sustainable, less carbon-intensive fuel sources as a way to address the climate crisis. If we continue to expand this dirty fuel source in Canada and other areas of the world, it is highly likely that the earth will see a 6C rise in average global temperatures rather than the 1.5C suggested by the Paris Climate Accord. The economic and social impacts of 6C will be catastrophic.
Additionally, the removal of millions of acres of boreal forests in Canada will only exacerbate the climate crisis. Indigenous people in the region liken the removal of these forests to “skinning the earth alive.” Photographs of the region testify to the moonscapes left behind after valuable, diverse forests are stripped away.
Some of the pollutants that are released as a result of tar sands mining are naphthalene acids, mercury, arsenic salts, and polyaromatic hydrocarbons. These are found in sediments of watersheds around tar sands and are toxic to invertebrate species. According to a report by Environmental Defense, “The Aamjiwnaang First Nation in Canada is experiencing disturbing impacts from the pollution as twice as many girls are being born as boys. Moore Township next to the reserve is also experiencing a lower male birth rate, and scientists have found evidence of “feminized” turtles in the St. Clair River that runs through the area.”
The U.S. is planning to invest an estimated $379 billion in Canadian tar sands through the year 2025. We will be fueling the climate crisis with this carbon intensive fuel that generates 3-5 times more emissions than conventional oil. Some refineries of tar sands oil in the Midwestern USA include PBF in Toledo, Ohio and Husky Energy in Lima, Ohio. Husky Energy is owned by the Chinese billionaire Li Ka-Shing. In 2019, the plant increased its capacity to refine tar sands oil to 40,000 barrels a day. PBF refinery in Toledo refines 170,000 barrels of oil a day.
When it comes to tar sands oil, the best stance to take is “keep it in the ground.”
***
Randi Pokladnik, Ph.D., of Uhrichsville, is a retired research chemist who volunteers with Mid Ohio Valley Climate Action. She has a doctorate degree in Environmental Studies and is certified in Hazardous Materials Regulations.
Last Updated: April 28, 2023 by main_y0ke11
Mid-Ohio Valley Climate Corner: Across the globe
Jan 1, 2022
Linda Eve Seth
editorial@newsandsentinel.com
“Global climate change has a profound impact on the survival and development of mankind. It is a major challenge facing all countries.” — Hu Jintao
***
The environmental and economic changes wrought by shifting climate patterns not only affect us here in the United States; they impact countries across the globe. All regions are affected, but not in the same way.
This piece offers a quick look at the impact of climate change already being felt on ecosystems, economic sectors, and people’s health and well-being in Europe, Asia, Australia, the Arctic, and South America.
ASIA-PACIFIC is the most disaster-prone region in the world. While poorer communities of this region contribute the least to greenhouse gas emissions, they are the ones feeling the consequences of climate change the most. With extensive coastlines, low-lying territories, and many small island states, its geography makes it highly susceptible to rising sea levels and weather extremes. Heat waves, floods, and droughts affect every aspect of life, from nutrition and health, to safety and income.
In Bangladesh, nearly 18 million people living in coastal areas will lose their homes if the sea level rises by three feet. Indonesia is already planning to move its heavily populated capital, Jakarta, inland to protect its residents from dangerous flooding.
Ocean acidification and coral bleaching, results of climate change, directly affect the biodiversity of marine ecosystems. As a result, food webs are altered and fish stocks collapse, putting millions of lives and jobs in this region at risk.
AUSTRALIA is particularly vulnerable to the effects of climate change because of its extensive arid and semi-arid areas, an already warm climate, high annual rainfall fluctuations, and existing pressures on water supply.
In recent years fires burnt across most of Australia with an intensity, extent, and duration not previously experienced. The devastating fires caused the burning of 50 million acres, the deaths of 34 people, the destruction of thousands of buildings, and the loss of millions of animals and their habitats.
At the same time, recent sea levels have risen in and around Australia at a faster rate than at any time in the 20th Century. Most of the population lives along the coast. The area is likely to see increased flooding and erosion of low-lying coastal areas. Higher storm surges will affect coastal communities, infrastructure, industries, and the environment.
Severe weather events such as bush fires and droughts, salinization of fresh water supplies, and coastal erosion are all having significant consequences on the natural environment and ecosystems, resulting in a loss of bio-diversity.
EUROPE is being affected by climate change in various ways, depending on the region. Some of the more widespread changes include biodiversity loss, forest fires, decreasing crop yields, and higher temperatures. It is also affecting people’s health; deaths have occurred as a result of flooding, heatwaves, and of hypothermia from blizzards.
Europeans are not only exposed to direct effects from climate change, but also vulnerable to indirect effects from infectious disease, many of which are climate sensitive. Climatic conditions have contributed to a geographic range expansion of tick vectors that transmit Lyme disease and tick-borne encephalitis. Extreme precipitation events have caused waterborne outbreaks and longer summer seasons have contributed to increases in food-borne diseases
In the ARCTIC things are warming faster than the rest of the planet, and in a region where ice and snow are so present, this has deep impacts. Data has made it increasingly clear that the Arctic as we know it is being replaced by a warmer, wetter, and more variable environment.
Reductions in snow cover change the availability of habitat for microorganisms, plants, and animals. Winter thaws and rain-on-snow events can damage vegetation, while refreezing creates a layer of ice over the vegetation that affects the conditions for grazing animals such as caribou, reindeer, and musk ox. The thinning and loss of sea ice has many impacts on Arctic life, including disrupting the feeding platforms and life cycles of seals, polar bears and walruses. And in ANTARCTICA, the Emperor penguins have seen a 53% reduction in their numbers recently.
Meanwhile, in SOUTH AMERICA — From the frigid peaks of Patagonia to the tropical wetlands of Brazil, worsening droughts this year are slamming farmers, shutting down ski slopes, upending transit, and spiking prices for everything from coffee to electricity. The levels of the Paran’ River running through Brazil, Paraguay, and Argentina are so low that some ranchers are herding cattle across dried-up riverbeds previously lined with cargo-toting barges. Raging wildfires in Paraguay have brought acrid smoke to their capital. Earlier this year, the historically rushing cascades of Iguazu Falls on the Brazilian-Argentine frontier have been reduced to a relative drip.
All around the planet, it is expected that mountain areas will experience higher temperatures, forcing the animals and plants to migrate to higher altitudes, endangering their species. Other regions will have more droughts, more forest fires, and fewer rains.
These changes jeopardize human health. Shifting rainfall patterns and higher temperatures affect agricultural productivity and impact food security. Low crop yields and high food prices make it harder and harder for people to feed their families, ALL ACROSS THE GLOBE.
***
Linda Eve Seth, M. Ed, SLP is a mother, grandmother, concerned citizen and member of MOVCA.
Last Updated: April 28, 2023 by main_y0ke11
Climate Corner: United States military bears responsibility for global woes
Dec 25, 2021
Aaron Dunbar
editorial@newsandsentinel.com
“Make no mistake: no military on the face of the earth works harder to avoid civilian casualties than the U.S. military.”
These were the words of Pentagon Press Secretary John Kirby after a U.S. drone strike killed Zemari Ahmadi, age 43; his children Zamir (age 20), Faisal (age 16), and Farzad (age 10); his relative Ahmad Naser (age 30); three of his nephews, Benjamin (age 6), Arwin (age 7), and Hayat (age 2); and two girls, Somaya (age 3) and Malika (age 3.)
A family of civilians, and U.S. allies at that, mistaken for Islamic State operatives and murdered by our government for the unforgivable crime of loading bottles of water into their Toyota Corolla, and looking a little bit too much like terrorists hauling bombs from a height of thousands of feet in the air.
Ramin Yousafi, a relative of those murdered, reported that “They are so burned out we cannot identify their bodies, their faces.”
U.S. Central Command went on to lie about “successfully hitting” their target and that it had “no indication” of civilian casualties, and would likely have maintained this line had it not been for in-depth reporting from the New York Times and the Washington Post, providing evidence to the contrary.
The Pentagon, in what was surely an impartial investigation of their own mass slaughter of children, later reported that “no violation of law, including the Law of War,” had taken place.
The only inference one can possibly make from this conclusion, that no one at all is to be held accountable for the horrific aerial murder of ten civilians and seven children, is that the war machine is functioning exactly as it should be.
These frequent incidents of mass civilian casualties are not a bug, but a feature.
Just days ago, the New York Times reported that a top-secret U.S. military unit known as “Talon Anvil” repeatedly and knowingly ignored safeguards by striking human population centers in Syria, killing farmers in their fields, children playing in the streets, and civilians attempting to take refuge from the fighting. The unit’s horrific actions were reported to superiors up the chain of command, but were routinely ignored.
Astonishingly, military officials have explicitly said that they refuse to do body counts of civilians killed by our armed forces. Indeed, our government seems far more interested in punishing those who expose the slaughter of innocents than reprimanding those war criminals actually responsible for the carnage.
Air Force veteran Daniel Hale, who leaked classified documents revealing a list of civilian casualties that would constitute multiple war crimes if proven, is currently languishing in a federal prison for revealing the truth. The CIA, meanwhile, actively plotted to assassinate journalist Julian Assange under the Trump administration, for his role in exposing war crimes in Iraq.
In 2022, the United States will spend $768.2 billion on its so-called national defense, more than the next eleven countries combined. With this grotesque sum of money we fund a globe-spanning death squad responsible for the indiscriminate destruction of human life, which answers neither to the taxpayers who fund it, nor seemingly to any actual governing body whatsoever.
It is absolutely infuriating to watch as our planet falls apart due to runaway anthropogenic climate change, and incorrigible corporate hacks like Joe Manchin weep crocodile tears about how we’re spending entirely too much money on trying to keep the human race from extinction. Meanwhile, he and every other politician in the country, save the most outspoken “radical” leftists and the occasional stopped-clock libertarian, are more than happy to continue writing out blank checks to the Pentagon to engage in endless, mindless bloodshed around the world, carrying out their profitable forever wars with absolutely no one holding them accountable for their actions.
Not only does our out-of-control military rob the nation of crucial resources that are desperately needed to combat the climate crisis, but their actions themselves contribute horrendously to global heating.
The Pentagon is among the largest polluters in history, with its emissions surpassing as many as 140 entire countries. If our military were its own nation, it would be the 47th largest emitter in the world based solely on its fuel usage. Last month, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was confronted with these facts by a climate change activist at COP26, over her support for increasing the U.S. military budget.
“National security advisors all tell us that the climate crisis is a national security matter,” Pelosi replied, going on to mention the threat of “migration,” with the implication that our military will be essential in abusing the climate refugees we’re directly responsible for displacing.
The logic on display here is mind-boggling, and tracks perfectly with America’s long, bloody tradition of forever wars. Essentially, the Pentagon pursues its “interests” around the globe and destabilizes region after region, creating a multitude of threats in its wake and then justifying its continued, bloated existence by claiming that it’s necessary in order to combat the very threats it helped to manifest. The playbook here is perfectly identical with regard to climate change, justifying runaway military spending to combat climate threats, even as our military’s actions directly produce those threats by playing an outsized role in the heating of our planet.
It’s been a common refrain among climate change activists that we need a “World War II-sized public response” to adequately counteract the climate crisis.
In today’s dollars, the United States spent about $4.1 trillion in the Second World War. Assuming my back-of-the-envelope math is correct, this means that in the past six years alone, we’ve spent about as much money on our military as we did during all of World War II. The amount being proposed for climate spending in President Biden’s Build Back Better program (which is already laughably small and woefully inadequate) is hardly even a fraction of what we waste on our military over the same period of time, yet lawmakers across the political spectrum treat it like some exorbitant pork spending that will lead us to financial ruin.
We simply cannot go on like this any longer.
In the lasting words of President Eisenhower, “Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed.”
Our bloodthirsty addiction to war cannot be sustained any longer. If Americans want any kind of decent future for their children on this planet, then they must make a crucial decision in 2022 and the years to come: their war machine, or the world.
***
Aaron Dunbar is a member of Mid-Ohio Valley Climate Action.
Last Updated: April 28, 2023 by main_y0ke11
Climate Corner: Hey, Joe — do the right thing
Dec 18, 2021
Giulia Mannarino
editorial@newsandsentinel.com
On Nov. 19, the House of Representatives passed the Build Back Better bill, Biden’s social safety net and climate legislation. This bill includes investments to assist working people and the middle class as well as the care economy; the elderly, disabled, college students and children. It also includes a national strategy to address climate change. It addresses this real and urgent challenge in a way that creates jobs, strengthens the economy, and invests in a healthier, more equitable, more promising future. And the costs will be fully paid by making sure the very wealthiest Americans pay their fair share in taxes. After passage by the House, this bill moved on to the 50-50 Senate where it has been stalled by Republican Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski and Democratic West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin.
Manchin used his power as the potentially decisive vote in the Senate to reduce BBB to $1.75 trillion. He also insisted on removing the “clean electricity plan,” which provided powerful incentives to help utility companies switch to renewable energy sources like the wind and sun. And even more cuts may come. Manchin has also objected to a measure in the bill designed to reduce emissions of methane, the main component of natural gas as well as a tax credit for electric cars. When pressed by reporters about whether he has a conflict of interest because his son runs the family coal company, Manchin told them “I have been in a blind trust for 20 years. I have no idea what they’re doing. You got a problem?”
A reporter for the Washington Post did have a problem with Manchin’s irritated response and the result was an article published by the Post on Dec. 13, which provided much of the information for this column. Don Fox, a former general counsel and acting director of the Office of Government Ethics, was asked to examine Manchin’s required annual financial disclosure report for 2020, which was filed in May. Fox states that Manchin’s dismissal of questions about his coal interests because they are in a blind trust is “misleading and at worst it’s just not true.” Manchin’s report shows, on Page 22, that the family coal company, Enersystems, paid him $492,000 in interest, dividends and other income and that his share of the firm is worth between $1 million and $5 million. And, the Joseph Manchin III Qualified Blind Trust shows, on Page 6, earnings of no more than $15,000 last year and is worth between $500,000 and $1 million. According to the article, because Manchin’s coal interests are not in a blind trust, it does call into question his impartiality as Chairman of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee.
A Qualified Blind Trust is a financial arrangement in which a person in public office gives the administration of their private business interests to an independent trust in order to prevent any conflict of interest the investments could create. This differs from a traditional trust in which the owner can be both trustor and trustee. A trustee alone (Huntington Bank in Manchin’s case) manages or invests the assets in a QBT with no communication between the parties. Neither the owner or his/her beneficiaries are to have knowledge of the holdings of the trust and no right to intervene in their handling. This creates a layer of separation between politicians’ personal financial interests and their official political activities and helps eliminate real or perceived conflicts of interest. Also, each year Congressional elected officials sign and swear that the public financial disclosure record filed is true and correct. This record specifically lists all property and assets except those held in a QBT. Only totals are given in disclosure records for those funds since, by design, it’s not possible to know precisely what is in a blind trust.
According to the news article, Manchin helped found and became president of Enersystems, a private coal brokerage firm based in Fairmont, in 1988. After Manchin was elected Secretary of State in 2000, he turned control of Enersystems to his son, Joseph Manchin IV, who still runs it. Enersystems benefits from federal programs to clean up closed coal mines where mining debris, waste-coal has been piled and abandoned. The waste-coal is sold to the Grant Town Power Plant, an electricity generating facility in Marion County. It is the only publicly recorded buyer of Enersystems’ waste coal, or what the industry calls “gob.” Only a handful of gob burning plants still operate nationally as these power plants are dirtier and don’t generate as much electricity. In fact, according to EPA’s most recent data, the Grant Town Power Plant emits more greenhouse gas emissions into the air per megawatt-hour of electricity produced than any other power plant in West Virginia. The Grant Town plant has come close to shutting down at least twice. In 2006, the plant was rescued by the state’s Public Service Commission approval of temporary rate increases which were passed on to customers. Although higher rates were to end in 2017, they were made permanent in 2015 when the plant’s owners came before the Commission once again. According to James Van Norstrand, director of WVU’s law school’s Center for Energy and Sustaninable Development, if the “clean electricity program” had been kept in the BBB plan, the Grant Town plant most likely would eventually have closed.
Although many top executive branch officials are required to divest assets to avoid potential industry conflict, members of Congress are not. It’s legal for Manchin to make millions from his coal interests even as he legislates on matters affecting the fossil fuel industry. Putting personal coal profits before the future of the planet and our grandchildren is certainly not the right thing to do.
Still BBB is the most consequential climate agenda in our country’s history. It needs to be passed as soon as possible and without more deletions. Take a look at the WV Citizen’s Action Group’s “Hey, Joe” Youtube video, a parody of the Beatles “Hey Jude,” filmed all across West Virginia. Then call or email Manchin every day and tell him “Hey, Joe. Do the right thing!”
***
Giulia Mannarino, of Belleville, is a member of Mid-Ohio Valley Climate Action.
Find Mid-Ohio Valley Climate Action on the following social media:
Check out our Facebook group and join a conversation
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Archives
Categories
Meta