Latest News - Page 8 of 49 - Mid-Ohio Valley Climate Action

Posted: March 2, 2024 by main_y0ke11

Climate Corner: Where have all the flowers gone?

Mar 2, 2024

Linda Eve Seth

editorial@newsandsentinel.com

What a lonely place it would be to have a world without a wildflower! — Roland R Kemler

***

Think about climate change. If you’ve been paying attention, you are likely picturing devastating floods, raging wildfires, melting glaciers, or parched earth. Few of us would think of the lovely, delicate wildflowers in nearby meadows as victims of climate change. But recent studies suggest the future of these pretty blooms may be dismal as a result of our warming planet.

For short-lived spring wildflowers (known as ephemerals), such as rue anemone, trillium, or Dutchman’s breeches, timing is everything. These fleeting plants grow in temperate forests around the world (West Virginia is home to a remarkable abundance of the delightful beauties.), leafing out and flowering early in spring before the trees above them leaf out and block the sunlight. Emerge too early, and it will still be winter; emerge too late, and it will be too shady under the forest canopy for the essential process of photosynthesis to take place.

Over their evolutionary history, these plants have figured out the best timing for their survival. But climate change is altering spring growing conditions, and in order to survive, plant life is changing along with it.

When scientists considered phenology — the timing of biological events — they found that trees in their studies were more sensitive to spring temperatures than wildflowers were, which has resulted in earlier tree leaf-out, reducing available light below in the understory, and making a less than ideal environment for spring ephemerals.

This pattern has been found to be common across three continents, North America, Asia, and Europe. Trees and wildflowers are active earlier now than in the past, especially in warm years and places. An analysis of over 400 plant species found that the average first flowering date from 1987 to present is a full month earlier than the average first flowering date from prior to 1986. That period coincides with accelerating global warming.

My personal experience and subsequent concerns arise from years of searching annually for spring ephemerals and recording the dates of my initial sightings of those beauties growing within 1/2 mile of my house in rural Ritchie County. Each year, from March through May, I find 80-85 different kinds of blooming wildflowers! Every year over the past decade, I have dutifully recorded the date I first noticed a species blooming. By reviewing my own charts, I see that in just that short period of time, most of the wildflowers in my corner of the world are blooming 2-4 weeks EARLIER than they did just 10 years ago. The greatest shifts have occurred in the past 4-5 years.

Although the sight of the first spring flowers is always special, this earlier flowering can have consequences for the ecosystems and agriculture. Other species (birds, bugs …) that synchronize their migration or hibernation can be left without the flowers and plants they rely on which can lead to biodiversity loss if populations cannot adapt quickly enough. Recent studies conducted in California have recorded a decline of wildflower species by 15% in 15 years.

The impact of climate change involves more than just losing the visual beauty of these wildflowers. As pollinator plants, wildflowers help to support declining bee populations as well as helping maintain a healthy population of other bugs which are paramount when growing fruits and vegetables; e.g. strawberries, raspberries, cherries, apples, and nuts.

Wildflowers supply seeds, insects, and other food for wildlife. On croplands and in forests wildflowers also provide erosion control and aid the management and filtering of storm-water. Their root systems create a natural groundwater filtration system and reduce the impacts of drought.

A study completed in 2022, has found that climate change not only reduces the abundance of wildflowers but causes them to produce less nectar and fewer and lighter seeds. These changes also impact pollinating insects visiting the flowers; they have to visit more flowers, more frequently, in order to gather the required food.

Some researchers warn that wildflowers may be doomed to fade away in coming decades. Due to our warming climate, trees in North American forests are leafing out earlier and earlier each spring. For the wildflowers on the forest floor, searching for energy from the sun, all that extra shady foliage could end up causing a lot of harm.

Not even those delicate, picturesque wildflowers are safe from the effects of climate change.

Until next time, be kind to your Mother Earth.

***

Linda Eve Seth, SLP, M.Ed. is a mother, grandmother, concerned citizen and member of Mid-Ohio Valley Climate Action

Posted: February 28, 2024 by main_y0ke11

Stop all LNG projects

2/28/2024
Randi Pokladnik
Canton Repository

The recent op-ed in The Hill, titled “Biden’s LNG decision will make it harder to reach our climate goals,” by Tim Ryan and Mary Landrieu, claims that “without natural gas as a foundation,” we cannot meet our climate goals.

The science is clear. We need immediate, concrete solutions to the climate crisis. We do not need a “bridge fuel.” Carbon capture and hydrogen hubs, funded by taxpayer dollars only serve to prop up fossil fuels and avoid transitioning to real solutions.

They are not proven to work at scale, are expensive, and do not address the increasing methane emissions from fracking. Liquified natural gas facilities release carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, and volatile organic compounds like the carcinogen benzene.

Ohio’s southeastern counties have become sacrificial zones as fracked gas heads to coastal export hubs. The 9th “Compendium of Scientific, Medical, and Media Findings Demonstrating Risks and Harms of Fracking,” said “there is no evidence that fracking can be practiced in a manner that does not threaten human health directly or without imperiling climate stability upon which human health depends.”

We can meet the climate challenge by building grid resilience, adopting renewable energy, and investing in energy efficiency. The Big Wires Act promotes more interregional transmission from areas with available energy to areas that need energy. It ensures “utilities and other transmission developers would be responsible for upgrading the grid.”

Technological improvements have now made renewable green energy cheaper than fossil fuels. Energy efficiency tax credits in the Inflation Reduction Act include “the installation of new doors, windows, skylights, insulation, heat pumps, installation of residential solar, small-scale wind, geothermal heat pumps, home battery storage, and fuel cell energy systems,” projects to help citizens and the planet.

Posted: February 24, 2024 by main_y0ke11

Climate Corner: Paradise threatened

Feb 24, 2024

Rebecca Phillips

editorial@newsandsentinel.com

As winter drags on in the Mid-Ohio Valley, many of us dream of escaping to tropical climes until spring. Since retiring, I have been lucky enough to do just that, spending several winters in the Yucatan peninsula, home to lovely people, peaceful beaches, scores of Mayan ruins, and 400+ species of birds. I am not the only one: in the winter months, snowbirds from the U.S. and Canada increase the population of the Progreso area by more than 10%, and the resort city of Cancun draws millions of vacationers every year. Culturally minded tourists flock to World Heritage sites like Chichen Itzo and Calakmul, while nature lovers come here to view the flamingos, motmots, and other gorgeous tropical birds.

Unfortunately, this beautiful region is one of those most threatened by climate change. Its geology and its location in the hurricane belt explain why. The Yucatan peninsula is a nearly flat limestone slab between the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean sea, with no place here more than a few feet above sea level and a water table that lies close to the surface, rendering it vulnerable to hurricanes and flooding.

The last few years have not been kind. As the world’s scientists have noted, warmer oceans are leading to more and stronger hurricanes. In 2020, the year of the pandemic, Yucatan experienced three tropical storms and two hurricanes in four months, along with record-breaking rainfall. Merida, the capital city, experienced serious flooding in a number of areas, with streets underwater, homes inundated, power out, parking garages rendered useless, and a section of its major underpass closed for weeks. With a new Category 6 proposed as a designation for the stronger hurricanes of the last few years, the situation is likely to worsen.

Hurricanes are not required for flooding in this vulnerable land. The winter storms known as Nortes are becoming more frequent due to changes in the atmospheric currents, meaning that the rainy season lasts longer. With the aquifers full, water has no place to go except across the surface. Just last week, a friend sent photos showing the Gulf of Mexico at the top of the steps leading to her terrace and the sand road next to her home completely underwater. Increased development in the area and an expansion of the Progreso pier, combined with the higher sea levels, have caused serious erosion of some areas of the coast. A longtime resident reports the loss of ten feet or more of beach near her home in the last decade.

The winds associated with these winter storms are also becoming stronger. Yucatan Magazine reported that the Feb. 5 storm brought winds of 75 mph — literally hurricane strength in what is not supposed to be hurricane season — due to an atmospheric cold front reaching the record-warm waters of the Gulf of Mexico. In addition to extensive flooding and property damage, at last report two fishing boats and the five men who crewed them were still missing. Weather forecasters are warning of more such storms this winter.

In a 2023 Washington Post interview, Yucatan governor Mauricio Vila stated that “important. . . [parts] of Yucatan and the Yucatan Peninsula will disappear in the next hundred years.” Yes, you read that right: the conservative-party governor of the state has admitted that climate change-induced sea level rise and flooding will cause some of the area’s fabled beaches to vanish in the possible lifetimes of children born today.

Too much water is not the only problem. Salvador Flores Guido, research professor at the Universidad Autonoma de Yucatan, has noted that both summer temperatures and periods of drought have increased here, leading to crop failures, livestock deaths, and water shortages. With almost no surface water, the population of Yucatan depends on groundwater and an extensive system of underground lakes called cenotes for its water supply. Sea level rise is causing saltwater intrusion into this fragile supply, and a corresponding reduction in freshwater availability. Professor Guido is also concerned about an increase in tropical diseases and heat-related deaths, especially in rural areas.

This place that so many view as paradise is in danger of being lost.

***

Rebecca Phillips is a WVU Parkersburg retiree and a member of Mid-Ohio Valley Climate Action and the Green Sanctuary Committee of the First Unitarian Universalist Society of Marietta.

Last Updated: March 7, 2024 by main_y0ke11

Property rights take a back seat to fossil fuel profits

February 19, 2024

Dr. Randi Pokladnik

LTE Columbus Dispatch

Ohio pro-fossil-fuel laws are enabling both public and private lands to be exploited by out-of-state fossil fuel companies. In 2022, House Bill 507 was passed during the 2022 General Assembly “lame duck” session.

This bill did not accept public comments and opened up public lands for fracking leases.

The Oil and Gas Land Management Commission disregarded the nine criteria contained in the statute, the vocal disagreement of over 100 informed, angry Ohio citizens, and the peer-reviewed health and environmental studies.

Private lands are also open for fracking as citizens can be forced to participate in oil and gas development via a forced pooling or mandatory unitization action. Our family was recently notified that our land is no longer exclusively ours, but instead is a part of a unitization parcel.

The chief of the Division of Oil and Gas at ODNR approves a mandatory pooling application by considering correlative rights; providing for effective development and use; and promoting conservation of oil and gas. Environmental harms or health effects are not considered.

Landowners have the choice between participating in the drilling unit or nonparticipating and risking penalties. In Ohio, citizens’ property rights take a back seat to fossil fuel profits.

Posted: February 17, 2024 by main_y0ke11

Climate Corner: Net metering benefits all

Feb 17, 2024

Jean Ambrose

editorial@newsandsentinel.come)

As someone who lives in rural Wood County, I experience frequent power outages. That means worrying about whether my freezer is going to thaw or if my blood sugar alarm is working. For my neighbor it’s her oxygen machine for COPD. That’s why the idea of “living off the grid” is so attractive to many people. When you can generate your own power you know it’s always there for you and you have the security that you’ll always be able to afford it.

With that in mind, we installed 18 solar panels six years ago. After the solar tax credit, the array cost us $12,000, which would take at least 10 years to get back in savings, but we wanted to contribute to reducing greenhouse gasses and also enjoy the sense of self reliance that comes from using the sun for our power needs. It still is magical to me. (A fun fact: the sun produces enough energy in one hour to power the entire globe for one year.) I could plug in an electric vehicle and eliminate my gasoline costs as well. The economic security this gives to a household is tremendous, to know you don’t have to worry about affording your heat and electricity and getting to work.

As electrification of our energy system moves inevitably forward, the case for making the change to solar gets stronger and stronger. Mon Power’s number of customers generating their own power increased from 306 in 2019 to 763 in 2023, according to PSC filings. Business and residential customers who have invested in their own solar power number around 5,000 according to Solar United Neighbors. If we use my own investment as an average, that means private individuals have voluntarily invested $60,000,000 into West Virginia’s power grid.

In return, customers with solar panels have a special electric meter that measures both kilowatts used and kilowatts generated; at the end of the month the customer pays for the difference or accumulates credits against their next bill. This is called net metering where the customer gets the same credit for the power they generate that the electric company charges. This is on top of the base rates they also pay to the electric companies which are supposed to be each customer’s share of transmission and distribution costs.

Seeing the increase in solar power, WV electric companies are working this legislative session to pay a much smaller wholesale rate for customer generated power. This eliminates the incentive for the average homeowner to make that big upfront investment; Dan Conant owner of Solar Holler in the Eastern Panhandle said his scheduled installations in First Energy territory all were canceled when this came up in the legislature. He thinks it will kill his business and any others in the state who are looking to invest in the jobs of the future in solar energy. (This happened in Nevada.) WV is ranked 49th per capita among all states jobs according to the annual census by the Interstate Renewable Energy Council with only 378 solar energy jobs, while Kentucky has 1595, Ohio has 7486, and Pennsylvania 4288 solar jobs .

41 states have net metering in place. It has been a critical policy for the expansion of solar businesses, but WV seems to want to discourage this economic development. WV electric companies say people who can’t afford solar energy are subsidizing those who can by not paying their share of transmission and distribution costs. That argument ignores the clear benefits to the electric grid and to other customers expansion of this energy resource provides. Solar home photovoltaic (PV) systems reduce the amount generated by or purchased from fossil fuel-fired plants. They decrease the amount of energy lost through transmission lines. By reducing demand on the grid, solar systems help ratepayers and utilities avoid the cost of new power plants, transmission lines and other electric infrastructure. Solar energy is stable, unlike the fluctuations we experience with other forms of energy, and helps stabilize rates otherwise subject to volatile fossil fuel prices. Solar PV energy also increases grid resiliency by decentralizing power production so one region’s problems don’t have to spill over into other regions.

Solar energy also creates valuable benefits to society at large and to the environment, which is one of my personal motivators for our family’s investment. 25% of greenhouse gasses which are warming our planet come from electricity production, the second highest after transportation (28% : EPA) Solar energy reduces air pollution that harms public health. It creates jobs and new business opportunities that spur local economies.

A review of 11 cost/benefit analyses of net metering revealed that solar energy brought more value to the community and society than the benefits received through net metering. (Shining Rewards: Lindsey Hallock, Frontier Group)

Net metering is smart public policy that creates benefits for all, including electric companies, and provides fair compensation to those who invest in solar. Government is always carving out exceptions and incentives for what are called “public/private partnerships.” Net metering is a creative public/private partnership that benefits, not just one or two companies, but hundreds of West Virginians, with the potential to benefit thousands. If solar homeowners were a single business, net metering would remain the law of the land without debate.

***

Jean Ambrose is trying not to be a criminal ancestor.

Posted: February 10, 2024 by main_y0ke11

Climate Corner:‘Some animals are more equal than others’

Feb 10, 2024

Aaron Dunbar

editorial@newsandsentinel.com

One of my first actions as a fledgling climate activist was to deliver 100 books on the subject of climate and the environment to the office of my climate change denying Congressman, Bill Johnson. I harbored no illusions that this action would convert my bought-off Representative into some born again eco-warrior, but at the very least I figured that: A. it would rob him of the cover of claiming there was “insufficient information” about the subject of climate change, and B. it would annoy him, and that would be funny.

Among the works I included in this collection was Thomas Friedman’s 2008 book “Hot, Flat, and Crowded: Why We Need a Green Revolution — and How It Can Renew America.” I enjoyed the book quite well at the time, and although I knew little else about the Pulitzer Prize winning author, I naively assumed that, because he was writing about climate, and because climate is the most important issue of our time, he and I must share at least a baseline similarity in terms of our overall worldview.

Fast forward to February 2, 2024, however, when the New York Times published the following article: “Understanding the Middle East Through the Animal Kingdom, by Thomas L. Friedman.”

Now, if that immediately sounds incredibly racist to you, don’t worry. It gets much worse.

Every Arab nation described in Friedman’s column is depicted as some species of insect, whereas the United States and Israel are “an old lion” and “a sifaka lemur,” respectively. Most notably, Friedman compares the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps to a parasitoid wasp infecting its host, and flatly declares that “We have no counterstrategy that safely and efficiently kills the wasp without setting fire to the whole jungle.”

For the New York Times to publish something so blatantly racist and openly genocidal is shocking, though perhaps on-brand for the paper that helped lie us into the Iraq War and initially downplayed the threat of Adolf Hitler.

What’s perhaps more shocking to me is the amount of sheer indifference to the loss of human life on display from individuals like Friedman, who purport to be advocates for the survival of our planet.

Dr. Leah Stokes, an environmental political scientist, recently tweeted her support for Joe Biden in response to his administration’s pause on natural gas projects, stating that “President Biden is a climate leader. And Trump? He’s an arsonist.”

Bill McKibben, often worshiped by environmental activists as a veritable climate messiah, responded to this with “very well put.”

It’s unclear whether the two of them were unaware of or simply indifferent to the ongoing genocide in Gaza perpetrated by their dear “climate leader,” which to date is responsible for some 30,000 deaths, over 10,000 of them children. According to The Guardian, the first two months of Israel’s U.S.-backed bombing alone generated more CO2 emissions than twenty other nations annually — to say nothing of the immense reserves of natural gas in Gaza that are currently being eyed by “the old lion and the sifaka lemur” as they “set fire to the whole jungle.”

For years the climate movement has been inculcated with warnings about the extreme racism of the far right, and the danger of growing eco-fascist ideologies which seek to pin the blame for environmental catastrophe on issues such as immigration and overpopulation, particularly among the Global South. But by all appearances, this gross and racist callousness toward human suffering is being paralleled by relatively “mainstream” neoliberals who falsely label themselves as pro-climate.

As climate essayist Mary Annaise Heglar opined, “I’m super confused how anyone can call themselves fighting for a ‘livable future’ while staying silent in the face of a literal genocide.”

In December, the center-liberal Atlantic published an article entitled “War in the Congo Has Kept the Planet Cooler.” This disturbing title was swiftly changed in response to the predictable backlash it received, but not before offering a startling glimpse at how the publication clearly tallies the value of certain human lives.

“An argument for war being beneficial for the climate without stressing the human casualties enables discussions that can be unethical and perverse. It implies that lives, African lives, are disposable in search of climate solutions,” write Nteranya Ginga, Tshimundu, Koko Ginga, and J. Munroe in their response to said article, published via Brittle Paper.

And yet I can’t help but wonder, how is this any different from the multitude of those in the environmental movement who dismiss issues such as child slavery being used in Congo’s cobalt mines to power rechargeable batteries and electric vehicles? This is a subject frequently broached in bad faith by the right, but which largely gets hand-waved away by mainstream segments of the climate movement, and treated as a complete non-issue.

At the end of the day, it’s abundantly clear that there are those with so-called “environmentalist” leanings who view the lives of their fellow human beings as expendable. They’re more than willing to compromise and ignore the safety and well-being of others so long as their own interests are met — chiefly, the maintaining of their own comfortable lifestyles, regardless of the human cost.

True climate activism is about the sacred preservation of life on Earth. Any activism that runs counter to that goal, be it to defend war, industry, or ideology, is not climate activism at all. It must be vocally denounced and rejected out of hand, given no opportunity for purchase in our fight for a better, more equitable world.

***

Aaron Dunbar is a member of Mid-Ohio Valley Climate Action.

Posted: February 5, 2024 by main_y0ke11

Climate Corner: Transition to cleaner energy offers opportunities

Feb 3, 2024 News and Sentinel

Heather Sprouse

hsprouse@wvrivers.org

Hydrogen, the simplest and most abundant element on earth, could be a key piece in the puzzle of energy solutions needed to avoid the most extreme impacts from climate change. There are multiple ways to produce hydrogen power, including nuclear, fossil fuels and renewable energy sources. Hydrogen is lightweight and could help us de-carbonize industries that emit high levels of greenhouse gases, such as freight hauling and cement manufacturing. In some countries like China, Japan and Germany, there are a significant number of hydrogen fueling stations for vehicles.

In October, the Biden-Harris administration announced the seven regional hydrogen “hubs” selected to receive $7 billion in federal funds from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. “Hubs” refers to the network of infrastructure needed to produce and connect the many different facilities involved in getting hydrogen fuel to consumers. Currently, most of the hydrogen in the United States is produced using fracked gas that is captured during underground drilling. Methane (CH4), a potent greenhouse gas, is a key component of fracked gas, which can be reformed to produce hydrogen energy.

In 2021, the U.S. Department of Energy created the Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations (OCED). This office was established to help scale up projects using emerging technology that could help equitably transition the U.S. to a low-carbon economy. Late last year, OCED announced their pledge of up to $925 million dollars to support private investment in the proposed Appalachian Regional Clean Hydrogen Hub (ARCH2). Most of the 15 facilities proposed to be part of ARCH2 are located in West Virginia, with connections to facilities in parts of eastern Ohio and southwestern Pennsylvania. ARCH2 is the only proposed hydrogen hub that would produce hydrogen energy solely from fracked gas.

When we consider the future of our economies and communities, we must think holistically. We have an incredible opportunity to invest in overall well being as we make decisions about how we will respond to the urgent need to de-carbonize. Well being is multi-faceted and includes access to good paying jobs, affordable housing, healthcare, and opportunities for recreation and a healthy environment, among other factors.

Each town that is proposed to host ARCH2 infrastructure has unique characteristics including history, geography and culture. These locations also have past experiences with industry that have left significant harms unresolved. Some of the communities impacted by ARCH2 projects lie in cancer clusters caused by chemical plants and coal burning power plants already located nearby. Nothing in ARCH2 plans detail how these harms will be minimized before additional fossil-fuel structure is permitted. We know that fracking causes greenhouse gas pollution. It also creates health harms to communities located near drilling pads and adjacent to waste disposal facilities.

OCED has committed to environmental justice and a robust community engagement process, ensuring that these unprecedented federal investments are for the benefit of everyone. Toward this goal, OCED has said a Community Advisory Committee will be established to guide the development of Community Benefits Agreements (CBAs). CBAs are legally binding agreements that provide communities with a tool for holding industry accountable. Benefits can include a commitment to providing job training and prioritizing local workers in employment contracts. Benefits Agreements can also detail how decisions that impact the community will be made, such as provisions for how a Community Advisory Committee operates, what decision making power it has and who is selected to participate. While this foresight from OCED can be applauded, it must be equitably implemented.

Hydrogen energy has the potential to help reach the goal of limiting global warming to 1.5C but working to simply stop the worst case scenarios is not enough. OCED has the opportunity to step forward as a leader in the energy transition by leaning into the wealth of strength and skills that exists in all of our communities. To achieve long term well being, and meet federally mandated environmental justice priorities, we must be intentional and hold our leaders accountable to a truly just transition utilizing less harmful energy sources.

***

Heather Sprouse is the Ohio River Coordinator with the West Virginia Rivers Coalition. She supports communities engaging with the environmental permitting process and advocating for their clean water priorities. She can be reached at hsprouse@wvrivers.org.

Last Updated: March 7, 2024 by main_y0ke11

Renewable energy is no threat to agriculture

Feb 3, 2024

RANDI POKLADNIK

Herald-Star Online

Why does Ohio’s Republican party continue to vilify solar and wind energy, as evidenced by a recent opinion piece “We must abandon reckless wind and solar subsidies” by U.S. Senate candidate Frank LaRose? His op-ed is a barrage of talking points propagated by trade publications and other opinion pieces; there are no peer reviewed studies cited.

The facts show that Ohio farmers do face obstacles, but not from renewable energy. Farmers in the Midwest are experiencing the effects of climate change — “increased average temperatures, changes in rainfall that can lead to flooding or droughts, and an increase in extreme weather events that can adversely affect crops,” especially corn and soybeans, the top two crops produced in Ohio.

Since the passage of SB52, many Ohio counties are vetoing utility-scale renewable projects. They are being misled by an anonymously funded group spreading misinformation about rural solar projects. The much-needed economic benefits these projects could bring to communities and farmers are lost. But Ohio citizens, like my family, desiring to protect their land from destructive oil and gas development have no such legislation. Instead, we are “forced pooled” by out-of-state energy companies using Ohio’s pro fossil fuel laws. Minerals resources are stolen from underneath Ohioans’ homes without their approval. Meanwhile, wind turbines in Ohio have some of the strictest set-back regulations in the nation (more than 1100 feet), but an oil or gas well pad can be located 150 feet from an occupied dwelling.

When it comes to subsidies, oil and gas industry subsidies have far exceeded any amounts awarded to renewables by the Inflation Reduction Act. In 2022, fossil fuel subsidies globally were more than $7 trillion, with the United States contributing $20 billion a year. This comes at a time when 2023 was declared the hottest year on record and the fossil fuel industry was making record profits ($200 billion in 2022.)

Additionally, these subsidies do not include social costs to humanity from toxic air and water emissions, including negative health effects costing billions of dollars in health care costs and labor losses. The Haliburton Loophole exempts oil and gas from almost every major environmental law. Billions of barrels of radioactive, toxic produced wastewater from fracking is unregulated under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and is injected into Class II injection wells in rural communities. Last year, the Division of Oil and Gas Resources Management found that “waste fluid injected into the three K&H wells had spread at least 1.5 miles underground and was rising to the surface through oil and gas production wells in Athens and Washington counties” endangering drinking water sources.

Most Ohio citizens know about the $60 million bribery scandal with HB 6, yet Ohio customers continue to pay more than $130,000 daily to bail out two 1950s-era coal plants (one plant is actually located in Indiana.)

Adding insult to injury is the recent passage of HB201, which will charge Ohio’s 3.7 million gas customers “up to $1.50 per month for as long as five years to extend gas lines to sites that could potentially be used for megaprojects, even if no buyer has been lined up.”

LaRose fails to mention that many of the IRA energy credits are going directly to consumers and will help Ohio families save on energy costs in the future. These credits include: “The installation of new doors, windows, skylights, insulation, heat pumps, installation of residential solar, small-scale wind, geothermal heat pumps, home battery storage and fuel cell energy systems.”

LaRose fails to mention that solar panel companies in Ohio are providing many long-term high paying jobs in local communities. In 2021, First Solar in Toledo, which already has two plants in Ohio, announced a third Ohio plant which will produce thin film PV modules. This $680 million dollar investment will be second only to China in number of panels produced.

If LaRose had done his homework, he would have learned that solar panels and farming are not incompatible. Livestock can graze and crops can be grown under solar panels. Agrivoltaics is a type of farming that uses a symbiotic relationship between solar panels and crops. Benefits from this method include less crop water use, increased solar production due to panel cooling from the crops, and less damage to crops from wind and hail.

“The groundbreaking 800 megawatt, 5,700-acre ‘dual use’ development known as the Oak Run Solar Project in central Ohio recently filed plans to implement agrivoltaics at a record-shattering scale. The project also proposes to launch a national training center in agrivoltaics.”

If we really want to talk about “phony policies costly to the environment” we should mention that Ohio’s Republican party continues to ignore scientific facts about the health and environmental effects from fracking by passing pro-fossil fuel legislation whenever it can. This comes at a cost to rural communities faced with the externalities from fracking. Our communities and our kids’ health have been sacrificed for fossil fuel development. We see the damage to our rural landscapes daily, including forest fragmentation from a spiderweb of pipelines, enormous water withdraws, air and water pollution, and radiation from produced water. The enormous amounts of fugitive methane emissions from fracking are also fueling climate change.

What really “lacks any humanity or common sense” is selling Ohio State Parks to the oil and gas industry, jeopardizing an annual $8.1 billion outdoor recreation industry and threatening 133,000 local jobs dependent on that industry.

Technological improvements have now made renewable green energy cheaper than fossil fuels. Yet, the Appalachian counties of Ohio continue to be a mineral colony for fossil fuels, and increased drilling is sanctioned by Ohio’s Republican Party. How long will Ohio’s Republican party continue to thwart Ohio’s progress into the future, and continue to rely on a destructive industry that requires more and more fresh water and more injection wells for toxic wastes?

(Pokladnik, a resident of Uhrichsville, holds a bachelor’s degree in chemistry, master’s and doctorates in environmental studies and is certified in hazardous materials regulations.)

Last Updated: February 1, 2024 by main_y0ke11

Good News for the Ohio River Valley!

Written by: Dr. Randi Pokladnik | Posted on: 12-30-2023 |

FaCT: Faith Communities Together for a Sustainable Future

Category: News | Ohio River Valley PTTGCA Solar battery storage FORM Energy

As 2023 comes to an end, the people in the Ohio River Valley are happily learning that the proposed plastic cracker plant for Dilles Bottom in Belmont County has been canceled!

After over five years of waiting, the primary investor, Thailand’s PTT Global Chemical America, has announced it has decided to build their plastics-making plant in Thailand instead of Ohio. The plant was put on hold back in April of 2020. Their partner, a U.S. subsidiary of South Korea’s Daelim Industrial Co., withdrew as PTTGCA’s partner in July 2020. Both companies had been planning major investments in the $5.7 billion plant, 60 miles southwest of Pittsburgh, for several years.

This means the Ohio Valley will not be subject to air and water emissions from the plastics plant. Emissions from plastics plants include: carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxide, volatile organic compounds, particulate matter and greenhouse gasses.

Another positive development is the hiring for over 750 full-time jobs by FORM Energy’s Iron/Air Battery Plant in Weirton, West Virginia. FORM Energy, a Massachusetts-based company, broke ground on its iron-air battery manufacturing plant this past May.

Workers will produce batteries capable of storing electricity for 100 hours. FORM’s batteries will run on iron, water and air instead of the more commonly used but less-abundant metal lithium. The $760 million project is being built at the site of the former Weirton Steel Mill.

These batteries will be used to power solar arrays during down times when solar energy is not available.

Climate Corner: Where have all the flowers gone?

Linda Eve Seth

Stop all LNG projects

2/28/2024
Randi Pokladnik
Canton Repository

Climate Corner: Paradise threatened

Rebecca Phillips

Property rights take a back seat to fossil fuel profits

Climate Corner: Net metering benefits all

Jean Ambrose

Climate Corner:‘Some animals are more equal than others’

Aaron Dunbar

Climate Corner: Transition to cleaner energy offers opportunities

Heather Sprouse

Renewable energy is no threat to agriculture

RANDI POKLADNIK

Suggested Readings for February 2024

Good News for the Ohio River Valley!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Categories

Meta

Linda Eve Seth

2/28/2024 Randi Pokladnik Canton Repository

Rebecca Phillips

Jean Ambrose

Aaron Dunbar

Heather Sprouse

RANDI POKLADNIK

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Categories

Meta

2/28/2024
Randi Pokladnik
Canton Repository