Exxon, Shell and climate change

Sep 23, 2018 Parkersburg News and Sentinel, Eric Engle

Benjamin Franta, a former research fellow at the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government, and doctoral candidate at Stanford University where his focus is on the history of climate science and politics, recently wrote a piece for The Guardian newspaper titled “Shell and Exxon’s Secret 1980s Climate Change Warnings.”

In the piece, Franta explores how documents from Exxon and Shell scientists in the 1980s clearly showed that CO2 release from the burning of fossil fuels would warm the planet and that climate catastrophe would undoubtedly ensue. Franta quotes Shell’s analysts as warning of “the disappearance of specific ecosystems or habitat destruction … runoff, destructive floods and inundation of low-lying farmland … and new sources of freshwater being required” to compensate for changes in precipitation. The Shell analysts also warned that global changes in air temperature would “drastically change the way people live and work” and that “the changes may be the greatest in recorded history.”

Exxon, as Franta quotes, warned of “potentially catastrophic events that must be considered” such as “devastating sea level rise” and “the American Midwest and other parts of the world becoming desert-like.”

To quote Franta directly, “The documents make for frightening reading. And the effect is all the more chilling in view of the oil giants’ refusal to warn the public about the damage that their own researchers predicted. Shell’s report, marked ‘confidential,’ was first disclosed by a Dutch news organization earlier this year. Exxon’s study was not intended for external distribution, either; it was leaked in 2015.”

These oil giants, and researchers that preceded them as far back as the 1950s who were also part of or consulted by the fossil fuels industry, decided for us that anthropogenic (human-caused) global climate change was not going to be meaningfully addressed. Instead, the industry started a massive, decades-long misinformation and denial campaign.

These documents reveal two things unequivocally: (1) even the industry most responsible found that human-caused global climate change is real and a growing threat, as we’ve seen daily. And (2) the fossil fuels industry should be held accountable for the lion’s share of mitigation efforts and efforts to prevent the most catastrophic effects of what they chose to ignore and deny.

A lawsuit filed by the group Our Children’s Trust (Juliana v. U.S.) seeks to hold the fossil fuels industry and U.S. federal government accountable for violation of the constitutional rights of the youth plaintiffs in the suit. The suit alleges that the industry and the federal government knowingly violated the rights of the plaintiffs (and of us all) to life, liberty and property, as guaranteed by the Bill of Rights, when they refused to address anthropogenic global climate change.

The suit, originally filed in 2015, has most recently been allowed to proceed by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and has a trial date set in federal district court on Oct. 29. Mid-Ohio Valley Climate Action is working with other organizations statewide to encourage people to show up at the federal district courthouse in Charleston on Oct. 29 to show our support for the plaintiffs and for holding industry and government accountable. Our Children’s Trust has asked people in every state to do the same.

The most profitable industry in the history of the world and an enabling government have attempted to decide our collective fate for us, but we will not go down without a fight and we will work toward a better future than the one they have tried to leave us with.

***

Eric Engle is chairman of Mid-Ohio Valley Climate Action.

 

Why Not Turn to Wind?

Why not turn to wind?

Sep 16, 2018 Parkersburg News and Sentinel Wayne Dunn

After reading Del. Frank Deem’s letter “Why turn to wind?” I felt very concerned for West Virginia for having elected officials so out of touch with science and reality. Not understanding the world we are moving into and not pushing hard for a more diverse economy that opens the opportunities into the future merely drags West Virginia down, while other states are moving ahead economically.

Coal is not and cannot responsibly be a part of our country’s distant future. Though it once served us well, its pursuit will likely spiral West Virginia downward. Mr. Deem states that we should not pursue wind electricity in West Virginia because we have coal, oil and gas. He apparently gets his “science” from the fossil fuel industry. Real science has conclusively shown a catastrophic future if we pursue coal, oil and gas electricity instead of sun, wind, nuclear, geothermal, etc. … anyone heard of human caused climate change? Rather than wind energy being three times as expensive as fossil fuels, utility scale wind/sun farming have dropped prices to nearly that of fossil fuels, and are far below fossil fuel costs in many parts of the world.

Though we have much gas available, coal in West Virginia is not price competitive within the U.S. Once 6-foot seams of coal are now 2- to 3-foot seams. Add another $3-4/ton to clean the dirt from these shallow seams. Shall we again mention the huge health, infrastructure and environmental costs that the fossil fuel industry puts on the backs of taxpayers? It’s time to move on.

President Obama’s Clean Air Act was a well thought out, science-backed effort to improve our health, well-being and environment. Its goal for cars of 54 mpg by 2025 would help cut living costs and improve health for all of us. Keeping car gas mileage at 37 or less mpg, as our present leaders want, merely costs citizens. So, who is looking after your interests? Mr. Deem’s plan will certainly cost us more and degrade health in even the very near future. Electricity will be more expensive with his plan. Check the science.

If we want a healthier, happier and less expensive society, then our policies and direction must be based on good information.

Dr. Wayne Dunn

Past County Commissioner

Mineral Wells

 

Mid-Ohio Valley Climate Action launches PSA contest

Parkersburg News & Sentinel Sep 3, 2018

PARKERSBURG — Mid-Ohio Valley Climate Action has organized a contest for students to develop a public service announcement about climate change.

The environmental advocacy group is encouraging high school and college students to develop an announcement of 25 seconds or less about the danger of climate change and the urgent need for action in the Appalachian region.

“Over the last year, MOVCA looked to air PSAs already done by other groups, but they were not relevant to our area, or there were too many restrictions on using them,” said Jean Ambrose, a vice chairman of the group. “We ended up creating one ourselves — and we’re still proud to show it — but we also liked the idea of a contest inviting area students and AV staff and faculty to create a PSA on climate change. This year, thanks to a grant from the Dunn Foundation, we are able to make it happen and offer prizes for winning PSAs in both video and audio formats.”

Ambrose said that Phase I of the contest includes cash prizes for the top three submissions in both video and audio categories.

The first-place video creators will be awarded $500, second place will receive $300 and third place $200. Audio awards are $250 for first place, $150 for second place, and $100 for third place, she said.

The contest rules and requirements have been distributed to schools and colleges through communications instructors.

Video or audio PSAs of 25 seconds or less must be submitted for review by Oct. 15 when judges will look at the quality and accuracy of the entries. Those approved will move to Phase II of the contest to compete on social media for the most views for an additional prize.

Giulia Mannarino, co-vice chairman, said the contest information form includes a list of readily available resources participants can consult so their PSAs accurately communicate the facts and science of climate change. A script including citations of sources for statements made must be submitted with the PSA.

“We hope to see and hear PSAs that tell us global warming is real, it’s caused by human activity, it’s urgent that we act against it, and that there are solutions out there right now,” Mannarino said.

The PSAs are to be directed to the Appalachian region and the Mid-Ohio Valley community at large, “so we are looking for elements that depict or reflect our area, “ Ambrose said. “We want these short messages to communicate ideas about climate change that our community needs to engage with, think through, and act upon.”

To download the full contest requirements and application forms, go to https://main.movclimateaction.org and click on the PSA contest menu item. Questions about the contest rules or application procedures should be directed to Ambrose at 304 679-3970 or to jeanambrose8@gmail.com.

 

It’s Time to Act on Climate Change

Daily News Opinion  September 6, 2018 Mark Reynolds –

Those of us who understand the existential threat posed by climate change have been waiting for the “Pearl Harbor moment” that galvanizes people and politicians alike into taking action to minimize that threat.

The year 2018 is turning out to be a “Pearl Harbor year,” where a majority of Americans support taking action, and we are ready for Congress to press forward.

We thought the wake-up call on climate change occurred in 2005 when Hurricane Katrina slammed and devastated New Orleans, a disaster that left 1,836 people dead and displaced tens of thousands more.

Four years later, when legislation to price carbon made a run in Congress, any sense of urgency to deal with climate change was lost amid partisan squabbling and pushback from special interests.

The next opportunity for action came in 2012 when Superstorm Sandy roared up the East Coast with a storm surge that put much of New York City under water. The cover of Bloomberg Businessweek proclaimed, “It’s Global Warming, Stupid.”

But again, nothing happened. Likewise, last year’s back-to-back-to-back storms — Harvey, Irma and Maria — left a swath of destruction from Houston to Puerto Rico totaling some $300 billion in damage. This, too, was not enough to spur action.

Fortunately, more and more Americans are connecting the dots between extreme weather disasters and climate change. That increasing awareness of the impact climate change exerts on our lives is reflected in the latest polling from the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication.

The Yale study found that 77 percent of U.S. adults support regulating carbon dioxide as a pollutant and that 68 percent support taxing fossil fuel companies while equally reducing other taxes. That support extends to all geographical areas of America, with majorities in all 50 states and all 435 congressional districts saying they favor a revenue-neutral carbon tax.

The Yale poll should come as no surprise, given that 2018 is turning out to be a Pearl Harbor year, not just a moment:

Triple-digit temperatures in California have created conditions for the worst wildfires the state has ever experienced. In Redding, California, those conditions produced a fire tornado with wind speeds up to 165 mph and temperatures that likely exceeded 2,700 degrees.

Smoke from western wildfires is drifting east, creating hazardous breathing conditions in cities along the way.

A combination of warmer water and nitrogen runoff from farms has produced the worst “red tide” ever seen in Florida. Manatees, sea turtles and millions of pounds of dead fish have washed up on beaches and affected the tourism industry.

Hundreds of deaths around the world have been attributed to record-setting heat waves in places like Japan, where 119 people died and thousands were hospitalized.

Of all the trends related to climate change, the most encouraging is the growing movement to depoliticize the issue and get Republicans and Democrats talking to each other about solving the problem. There are now 86 members in the bipartisan Climate Solutions Caucus in the U.S. House of Representatives, half Republican and half Democrat. In late July, the co-leader of the caucus, Rep. Carlos Curbelo, R-Fla. — joined by Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick, R-Pa., and Rep. Francis Rooney, R-Fla. — introduced the first Republican-sponsored bill to price carbon in nearly a decade. Curbelo’s bill is a major crack in the dam holding back effective climate legislation, and that dam is likely to burst in the months to come.

As Congress returns from August recess and members make their final reelection push, my hope is that climate change becomes a bridge issue rather than the wedge issue it’s been for so many years. Throughout our history, Americans have set aside our differences and come together in times of crisis to turn back a common foe. We can and must do that now with climate change.

The terrifying vortex of fire that swept through Redding, California, is the latest Pearl Harbor moment for climate change in a year filled with such moments. Let us hope this year of infamy, together with the growing desire for action, will finally set the wheels in motion for Congress to enact meaningful solutions.

Mark Reynolds is executive director of Citizens’ Climate Lobby.

Note: MOVCA is an associate member of Citizens Climate Lobby

WV needs lawmakers to adopt pro-growth solar strategy

Charleston Gazette-Mail Editorial September 6, 2018 Autumn Long-

Last week in the Charleston Gazette-Mail, your editorial posed a question: “If renewable energy catches up faster than expected, is WV ready to benefit?” The answer: Not yet — but it could be. And more West Virginians could be benefiting from solar right now, through third-party financing.

It is no longer necessary to speculate whether or when renewable energy will reach economic parity with fossil fuels. That reality is happening today. Our energy system is rapidly changing. The last century’s wasteful, cumbersome, centralized system powered by fossil fuels and dominated by outsized special interests is evolving into an efficient, distributed structure in which ordinary people are no longer relegated to the role of passive consumers. Rather, we can become active energy producers in a resilient, fair and more affordable energy system.

West Virginians will be left behind if our elected officials do not act quickly and assertively to create a policy environment that encourages growth, competition and diversification in this newly unfolding energy system. While neighboring states attract major investments, expand their tax bases and create thousands of new jobs in the renewable energy sector, our state offers little to encourage innovative entrepreneurship or entice large employers that increasingly demand access to renewable energy.

If West Virginia dumps all its eggs into the basket of gas, it will be repeating the same disastrous mistake that has left our public coffers overly dependent on, and exposed to the vagaries of, a single extractive industry — coal — for the past century. History will repeat itself as the latest shale gas boom turns bust and renewables take center stage as the backbone of a new energy economy.

The good news is that our lawmakers can take specific steps to encourage renewable energy development and investment in West Virginia. Chief among them is legalizing solar Power Purchase Agreements, a popular solar financing method that is available in 26 states, as well as Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico.

A solar PPA is a contract through which a third-party developer installs a solar array on a host customer’s property, and the customer purchases electricity produced by the array at a fixed rate.

Widely used by commercial businesses and tax-exempt institutions like schools, churches, hospitals and municipalities, solar PPAs allow energy consumers to install solar with zero upfront cost while lowering electric bills from day one.

Regrettably, solar PPAs are illegal in West Virginia. Meanwhile, our monopoly electric utility companies are guaranteed a rate of return on their investments, and consumer electric rates continue to rise. By legalizing solar PPAs, the Legislature would open the door to economic growth, investment and job creation in West Virginia.

Entrepreneurs could install solar arrays on our state’s businesses, manufacturing facilities, schools, hospitals and government buildings. Low-income families could access stable, affordable electricity rates through community solar projects, where customers buy a “share” of the energy produced by a centrally located solar array. Large-scale solar projects could be developed on former mine land, brownfields and other degraded sites, bringing good local jobs and investment to West Virginia communities.

Legalizing solar PPAs should attract widespread bipartisan support from our state lawmakers. This policy is pro-jobs, pro-competition, pro-growth and pro-business. It is a linchpin needed for a stronger and more diversified economic future in West Virginia.

It’s up to our state’s lawmakers to take a true leadership position and embrace a future powered by a diverse mix of energy sources in which renewables play leading roles. History, and future generations, will judge us by the decisions we make today.

Autumn Long, of Harrison County, is West Virginia program director for Solar United Neighbors.

 Note: MOVCA is a sometimes partner with Solar United Neighbors.

Extreme Weather and Climate Change

Marietta Times Editorial  August 26, 2018

George Banziger, Marietta –

We in the Mid-Ohio Valley have experienced a relatively moderate summer — no extended heat waves or severe storms. Such is not the case in other parts of our country and in other parts of the world. Eve n before our summer officially started, a serious heat wave gripped the country in the month of May; that month, as a result, was the

fourth hottest May on record. And as the summer emerged in the northern hemisphere, four continents (Europe, Asia, northern Africa, and North America) experienced their hottest summer on record. In one oil city in Algeria temperatures reached 1240F Fahrenheit; in Pakistan it reached 1220F and in normally cool Oslo, Norway 860F for 16 consecutive days. Scientists predict that heat waves will be more common than in the past due to human-induced climate change. Northern climates, where carbon emissions are the most common, are heating faster than the global average. What, then are the short term and long-term consequences of these extreme weather events throughout the world? The open-access medical and scientific publication called PLOS in its Medicine Project, concluded that there has been an increase in mortality due to these unusual heat waves. In Algeria oil workers were not able to work more than two hours per day in the extreme heat. In North America rails are buckling under extreme heat, leading railroad companies to paint them white to reflect more of the heat. Forest fires have become more severe and extensive in the American West. Some farmers in Europe are strongly considering slaughtering their herds rather than continuing to struggle with feeding them in the face of decreasing water and grain and hay harvests. In the long term crops grown in moderate climates will not grow under extended heat waves; fish will be harvested in fewer numbers in warming oceans; and animals raised in overheated environments will be lighter and less numerous. The threats to wildlife in natural habitats of the northern hemisphere are even more disturbing; in fact, the Marietta Times recently carried an article reporting that the climate change is the likely reason for the decline in number of bird species by 43% in the Nevada and California area. In the past scientists have struggled to identify a causal link between human-induced climate change and extreme weather. Now there has been a break-through in scientific methodology to more clearly make this connection. In analyzing data from Australian heat waves in 2013, downpours in Louisiana in 2016, and flash floods in France, scientists have compared two sets of climate models — those that take in to account existing conditions, in which rising carbon dioxide has warmed the planet and those that assume CO2 emissions had never happened and the climate is as it was more than a century ago. This approach to studying extreme weather events is called climate change

attribution. In applying this “attribution” method to data from the 2017 Hurricane Harvey in southeast Texas, scientists have been able to attribute the extreme rainfall of this event to climate change. During Hurricane Harvey 50 inches of rain occurred in some areas. World Weather Attribution concluded that climate change accounted for an increase of the rainfall associated with Harvey by a factor of three. In the devastation wreaked by this hurricane, 80 people died and thousands of homes and businesses were destroyed by flooding. We can anticipate more human suffering and death as well as increased property damage if we do not take action to mitigate the effects of climate change and reduce carbon emissions. These steps include rejoining the Paris Climate Accord, continuing to support the closing of coalfired power plants (while transitioning workers and communities from coal to 21st century energy production), reducing methane emissions from the process of hydraulic fracturing (fracking), reinforcing sustainable agriculture, and making the commitment to renewable energy. We can demonstrate our  personal engagement to reducing carbon emissions by opting for hybrid and electric vehicles, solar panels for  generating home electricity, and practicing the three Rs — reduce, reuse, and recycle.

 

Man-made woes

Parkersburg News and Sentinel – Aug 19, 2018 Margaret Meeker –

After watching the news of the fires in California a family member said, “Is God trying to tell California something?” I don’t think it is God but it is Mother Earth telling us that for years we have been sending pollutants into the air that have caused the ocean temperatures to rise, caused droughts, heavy rainfalls, mud slides, flooding, etc.

Yes, some human being did deliberately start at least two of the fires in California. Are they terrorists? They certainly have caused more property loss and destruction to the earth than human kind has seen in years.

Well, if one is following the news, you have seen pictures of all the dead animals washing ashore in Florida. Did God do that? No, the governor and legislators of Florida did not think that the Environmental Protection Agency should dictate what could be put into the waters of the state which eventually flowed into the ocean.

Just think back a few years about the contaminated water near Charlestown, W.Va. Was this caused by God? No, it was a chemical company that ignored the regulations of the EPA.

Why is Black Lung on the rise for coal miners? The remaining coal companies do not want to listen to EPA.

Why is there a lawsuit concerning C8? Because a manufacturing company was extremely careless about dumping chemicals that eventually entered the water source for many in Ohio and West Virginia.

Our Rep. David McKinley boasts about the coal production rising since 2016 election. He has worked alongside other members of the U.S. House of Representatives to weaken all regulations. He does not want to see solar and wind power grow in our state nor the country. Why does he support an administration in Washington D.C. that has pulled the U.S. out of the Paris agreement? Why does he support an agency that permits asbestos to be made and used in construction again?

Some do not want global warming or climate change taught in our schools. How will they explain the huge amount of cancer in our area? Why do we have two Cancer Centers in this area of the Ohio Valley?

To the Administration and the EPA: We urge you to rethink and reverse your latest proposal to strip California’s ability to regulate car emissions that damage our lungs, hearts, and brains, and cause climate change.

For those who read the Bible, I think it says that man was to care for the world not destroy it.

Margaret Meeker

Williamstown

Work to fight climate change

Parkersburg News and Sentinel – Aug 19, 2018 Eric Engle –

Dangerous anthropogenic (human-caused) global climate change is upon us. It is not just a threat to be feared down the road, but is a reality here and now.

Europe and Japan are boiling under record-breaking heatwaves; the American West is burning; we have seen record-breaking hurricanes and precipitation events completely ravage Puerto Rico, Texas and Florida, and in Puerto Rico we now know that over 1,400 people died after Hurricane Maria on the soil of an American territory. Almost a year later, many remain without power.

Attribution science now allows the global scientific community to very accurately assess the degree to which the variable of anthropogenic global climate change is a factor in weather events. For example, researchers at Columbia University and the University of Idaho have found that climate change has more than doubled the forest fire areas in the western U.S. since 1984 by causing warmer and drier conditions.

With dangerous climate change already here, what we must work to do is stop catastrophic climate change or, worse yet, existential climate change (the point at which climate change threatens human existence itself). On our current trajectory, we are not set to stop catastrophic or eventually existential climate change at all.

What does stopping the climate catastrophe mean? For one thing, it means we cannot afford an Appalachian Storage and Trading Hub in the Ohio Valley with its hundreds of miles of pipelines, thousands of hydraulic fracturing (fracking) sites and processing facilities, and underground storage of petrochemicals and fracked gas liquids — every stage of natural gas development from extraction to transport to storage to use releases an enormous amount of methane, a heat-trapping greenhouse gas 86 times more potent than carbon dioxide over a 20-year period. It also means that we cannot continue to burn coal, the worst fossil fuel for greenhouse gas release, for energy at places like Pleasants Power Station.

Our future must be in renewable energy (especially solar and wind energy) with battery and other storage capacity; in the zero emission electrification of all land, sea and air transport; in maximum energy efficiency; and in sustainable development and agriculture. Going this direction will have the added benefits of creating more jobs, repairing our crumbling infrastructure, saving countless lives and improving the health of countless people by reducing air and water pollution, and helping us address our enormous waste problems, especially from plastics.

The public policies, investments, technologies, knowledge and capabilities all exist … all that is lacking is the political and social will.

Eric Engle

Parkersburg

Mother nature can’t keep up with man’s CO2

Jul 28, 2018 Editorial by David Ballantyne, Newport, Ohio The Marietta Times

I have been honored to teach climate science in the public schools the past two years.

My experience with students is that most generally believe that climate change is a natural process which has been occurring throughout earth history. Surveys of adults indicate that they overwhelmingly believe the same and I happen to agree with them. Thus, when teaching I make this my starting point – the Natural Causes of Climate Change.

The climate of any location on Earth is related to its distance and angle from the sun. The closer to the sun and the more direct the angle the warmer the climate.

Everyone is familiar with the sun being lower on the horizon in winter and higher in summer. That change is caused by the earth’s tilt in relation to the sun. As nearly every student knows, the North Pole is pointed at the North Star in both summer and winter. Thus, the Earth cycles annually in its relationship (angle) to the Sun to maintain a constant stellar relationship.

What causes natural climate change; slow, gradual, cyclical changes in this tilt angle plus the ovality of Earth’s orbit. These changes are small with extremely long cycles, measured in many thousands of years.

These changes do not change the overall amount of solar energy being received from the Sun. They merely redistribute the energy for the location received, and they change the length and severity of the four seasons.

These orbital cycles additionally impact ocean currents, ocean temperatures and polar freezing and thawing. While the orbital changes are the “trigger” for natural climate change, it is the ocean temperature driven changes in the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere which is the “bullet” causing surface temperatures to change. Because these changes are cyclical, they and their impacts change naturally back in the other direction.

All of the preceding is described in Dr. James Hansen’s, 7-23-2015 paper titled, “Ice melt, sea level rise and superstorms: …” Dr. Hansen is lead U.S. Representative to the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

The oceans play an important role in Earth’s natural balance of atmospheric CO2. Overall, there are 100s of times more CO2 dissolved in ocean water than contained in the atmosphere. Similar to “soda pop,” the solubility of CO2 changes with water temperature. Warm water expels/releases CO2, while cold water absorbs increasing amounts of CO2.

With the orbital changes described above, the earth “re-balances” itself naturally. As Earth re-balances to warmer oceans, higher concentrations of CO2 in the atmosphere cause additional warming due to the “Greenhouse Effect.”

This process continues until the orbital changes apex and turn in the other direction, diminishing their impacts. Four of the five “great extinctions” in Earth history are believed to have been caused by natural climate change – the exception being what we believe to be “a meteor strike.”

Now enters mankind. Humans through our respiratory processes are part of Earth’s natural CO2 rebalancing process. On the other hand, man also produces CO2 through our industrial processes. Mankind’s extra CO2 from industrial processes has no equivalent natural rebalancing mechanism. Mankind’s industrial activities release approximately 5.5 gigatons of CO2 into the atmosphere annually.

This is overwhelming nature’s ability to keep up. Eighty percent of this is the use of carbon fuels, and 20% is deforestation. Today, we are experiencing levels of CO2 in the atmosphere which nature has not experienced in more than 800,000 years.

Pure and simple, that is our climate dilemma, and the planet needs your help to address this.

David E. Ballantyne

Member of Mid-Ohio

Valley Climate Action

Newport

2017: Changing minds about climate change

2017: Changing minds about climate change

May 19, 2018 Editorial by David Ballantyne, Newport, Ohio The Marietta Times

Dr. Bob Chase, a regular contributor to Marietta Times “Viewpoint” recently expressed belief in Methane and CO2 emissions as sources of human caused climate change. I am a regular reader of Dr. Chase’s letters, and that was the first time I’ve heard him say that. I thought that cause for celebration.

It is a pleasure to welcome Dr. Chase, emeritus professor and former Chairman of the Petroleum Engineering Department of Marietta College, to the view shared by the majority of Americans on this issue. It appears that 2017 was a particularly influential year for many. The damaging effects from various types of extreme weather (hot and cold, wet and dry), caused many Americans to re-think their views. It reminds me that in the Movie “The Day after Tomorrow” about Global Warming the victims froze to death.

The Climate Institutes of Yale and George Mason Universities have, in a joint effort been surveying Americans continuously since 2008 on beliefs towards Climate Change. The institutes publish a summary of their data twice a year. Their earliest conclusion from their fifteen-question survey was that there are “Six Americas” in public awareness and belief on this subject. They described these six as; Alarmed, Concerned, Cautious, Disengaged, Doubtful and Dismissive. In their twice annual summaries, they report the percentage of the population who’s beliefs are in each of these categories. As one might expect, most people are in the middle of this spectrum. You might speculate as to which adjective best describes your views. The percentages don’t change much from one report to another. However, the trend since 2015 is that while the highest and lowest groups have not changed much, those people in the middle groupings have moved steadily higher on the scale. In 2017, this trend accelerated. The following quotes are taken from the “executive summary” contained within the October 2017 report.

Seven in ten Americans (71%) think global warming is happening, an increase of eight percentage points since March 2015. Americans who think global warming is happening outnumber those who think it is not by more than 5 to 1.

Over half of Americans (54%) understand that global warming is mostly human-caused.

More than six in ten Americans (63%) say they are at least “somewhat worried” about global warming. About one in five (22%) are “very worried” about it – the highest levels since our surveys began, and twice the proportion that were “very worried” in March 2015.

Nearly two in three Americans (64%) think global warming is affecting weather in the United States, and one in three think weather is being affected “a lot” (33%), an increase of 8 percentage points since May 2017.

A majority of Americans think global warming made several extreme events in 2017 worse, including the heat waves in California (55%) and Arizona (51%), hurricanes Harvey, Irma, and Maria (54%), and wildfires in the western U.S. (52%).

More than four in ten Americans (44%) say they have personally experienced the effects of global warming, an increase of 13 percentage points since March 2015.

Four in ten Americans (42%) think people in the United States are being harmed by global warming “right now.” The proportion that believes people are being harmed “right now” has increased by 10 percentage points since March 2015.

Half of Americans think they (50%) or their family (54%) will be harmed by global warming.

Two in three Americans (67%) say the issue of global warming is either “extremely” (12%), “very” (19%), or “somewhat” (37%) important to them personally, while one in three (33%) say it is either “not too” (19%) or “not at all” (14%) important personally. The proportion that say it is personally important has increased by 11 percentage points since March 2015.

Nearly four in ten Americans (38%) say they discuss global warming with family and friends “often” or “occasionally,” an increase of 12 percentage points since March 2015.

While opinion is not the same as Science, my belief and I hope those also of Dr. Chase now feel that the evidence and the documented science supports the above consensus.

David E Ballantyne

Newport, Ohio

Member of Mid-Ohio Valley  Climate Action