More common sense needed on fossil fuels

Column Jul 11, 2020 Times Leader by RANDI POKLADNIK

Environmental Consultant and Trainer

Last week’s Times Leader (July 5, 2020) carried an op-ed by Greg Kozera, the director of marketing and sales for Shale Crescent USA. In the op-ed Mr. Kozera talked a lot about common sense and our need for fossil fuels: specifically, plastics.

In a world drowning in plastic, common sense would dictate that we need to significantly cut down on our production of single-use plastics. According to the Ocean Conservancy, which monitors litter on beaches worldwide, the 10 most common items of litter picked up by volunteers were made of plastic. This included cigarette butts, food wrappers, drink bottles, caps and grocery bags. Not surprising, as plastic packaging makes up about 40 percent of all the plastics produced today.

One of the major issues with plastics is that they do what they are intended to do very well; they last forever. Plastics are long-chain carbon polymers that are synthesized from petroleum or natural gas feedstocks. Unlike other naturally occurring long-chain carbon compounds, such as carbohydrates found in plants, plastics will not degrade when exposed to enzymes or bacteria in the environment.

Common sense would ask is it wise to expand the production of something that never degrades? According to a study published in 2017 in Science Advances, we have produced approximately 8,300 million metric tons of plastic since the 1950s. Plastic waste now blankets our planet. More than 8 million tons of plastic is dumped into our oceans every year. Peer reviewed studies show that water from the Great Lakes contains a substantial amount of microplastics. Research published in the Public Library of Science disclosed microplastics were in 12 American beers. A study published in ORB Media determined that of 159 tap water samples taken from around the world, 83 percent contained plastic particles.

Mr. Kozera points to recycling as a solution to our plastic wastes. In 2017, there were 6.3 billion tons of plastic waste. Only 9 percent was recycled, 12 percent was incinerated and 79 percent ended up in landfills or the environment. I am old enough to remember the Keep America Beautiful anti-litter campaign of the 1970s. Backed by the beverage industry, it was a slick attempt to continue the production of plastic beverage bottles by passing off the responsibility for litter to consumers. Common sense would ask how successful has recycling been if after nearly 50 years, we only recycle 9 percent of our plastic waste.

In order to make plastic, the industry relies on a finite resource; fossil fuels. The fracking required to obtain ethane creates an enormous impact on the planet, including water and air pollution. Greenhouse gas emissions, in the form of methane and carbon dioxide make plastic production a major contributor to climate change. Under the Bensten Amendment, oil and gas wastes from exploration and production are exempt “from federal hazardous waste regulations.” Tests have shown wastes contains high levels of brine, toxic chemicals and radioactive isotopes. This brine is being marketed to consumers as deicers and spread on Ohio’s roads. A study by the Colorado Department of Health has shown that living near oil and gas activities results in exposures to toxic compounds such as benzene and toluene and poses a substantial health risk to people.

Given all these negative externalities, such as health effects and environmental destruction, does it make sense to use plastic wrap or containers for food items that have a shelf life of days? How could we explain to our great grandchildren that we used precious fossil fuel resources and ruined our planet to wrap green peppers and bananas?

Mr. Kozera tries to spin COVID-19 as a reason to use plastic bags. A recent Harvard study determined that “long-term average exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) is associated with an increased risk of COVID-19 death in the United States.” The Shell cracker plant will emit 159 tons of 2.5 particulate matter a year. Peer reviewed research shows that when exposed to toxic compounds, plastic acts as a sponge absorbing those toxins. Plastic can also leach unreacted monomers as well as plasticizers such as bis-phenol A (BPA). Chemicals can migrate from the plastic into the foods inside.

Certainly, there are applications that suit the use of plastic, ones that involve long-term uses. However, the industry is currently creating a supply, not filling a need as it pushes single use items and plastic packaging at the consumers of the world. According to the statistics site, Statista, the amount of plastic produced each year, 300 million tons, is equivalent to the weight of humanity.

Mr. Kozera says “we just can’t blindly follow or believe everything we hear or read.” I totally agree. We need to do our own research, finding sources that produce data based on independent studies, ones not funded by fossil fuel money. Lenny Bernstein, a climate expert with Exxon Mobil, said the company was aware of climate change in 1981, but they chose to cover the data with a massive program to promote climate denial much like the tobacco industry. This industry also receives $20 billion a year from the U.S. in subsides.

Mr. Kozera says “we need to educate ourselves and let go of long held beliefs that are wrong or not true.” I totally agree. This can be said of the belief that the Ohio Valley cannot have environmentally sustainable, safe jobs. Residents must stand-by while foreign corporations use the resources of the region to make profits for stockholders, leaving taxpayers with the bill to clean up the environmental destruction.

Contrary to Mr. Kozera, I believe most people realize that solar panels do not work at night. What he doesn’t know or fails to state is that excess solar energy can be stored in battery farms. Bloomberg reported that Tesla’s Hornsdale Power Reserve has saved South Australians $116 million as it stores power during low demand times and releases it during high demand times. China also has a battery farm, The China Shoto produces 30 MW of solar power supported by 20 MW of energy storage.

When it comes to the fossil fuel industry “common sense is much less common than you think.”

Randi Pokladnik is a Urichsville resident who holds a bachelor’s degree in chemistry as well as amaster’s and Ph. D in environmental studies. She is a member of the Fresh Water Accountability Project Board of Directors, holds a certificate in hazardous materials regulation and is an Ohio certified naturalist volunteer. She also is active with several local environmental organizations.

Better alternatives to extraction industry dependence

Jul 11, 2020 Parkersburg News & Sentinel by Eric Engle

In the July 5 edition of the Parkersburg News and Sentinel, a piece appeared on the front page of the business section touting the recent report from the U.S. Department of Energy entitled “The Appalachian Energy and Petrochemical Renaissance: An Examination of Economic Progress and Opportunities.” The piece quoted extensively from entities like Shale Crescent USA and the American Chemistry Council and essentially amounted to nothing more than oil and gas industry public relations propaganda. The piece suggested a future for Appalachia that leaves this wonderful region of the country the extractive industry sacrifice zone it has been for far too long. Other, better alternatives exist.

A coalition of 80 different grassroots and non-profit community organizations released a report one day prior to the DOE’s report entitled the “National Economic Transition Platform.” This report was “crafted by Local, Tribal, and Labor Leaders to build sustainable, resilient, and equitable economies for the people and places hit hardest by the changing coal economy.” The report advocates for a national transition program that rests on seven pillars: local leadership, restorative economic development, workforce development and worker health, reclamation, infrastructure, bankruptcy, and coordination and access. You can download the full report at nationaleconomictransition.org.

Other initiatives offer important alternatives as well. An initiative called Reimagine Appalachia has begun with endorsements and contributions from organizations and individuals throughout the four states that make up the Ohio River Valley — Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio, and Kentucky. The focus of the initiative is to “reimagine a 21st Century economy for the Ohio Valley that’s good for workers, communities, and the environment.” You can learn more at reimagineappalachia.org. An extensive framework for this movement has been developed and continues to be shaped.

The industry propaganda talks about 100,000 direct and indirect jobs, $28 billion in investments, and an expansion of good old American manufacturing; but how many of those jobs are permanent, how much of that investment will benefit Appalachian communities both short- and long-term, and do the value-added products and other results of that manufacturing actually stay in or around Appalachia? The industry doesn’t want to talk to you about the answers to those questions. The article seems to suggest, without directly stating, that 630,000 manufacturing jobs, or 13 percent of the overall direct jobs market, come from shale development in Northern and Central Appalachia; but it doesn’t define what it means by Northern and Central Appalachia and it doesn’t define what it means by manufacturing. Those are statements worthy of a high-priced industry lawyer or PR firm.

The industry talks a lot about energy, but energy has nothing to do with what they envision for the Ohio River Valley. They’re envisioning a plastics and petrochemical hub that spans the entire river valley, a Cancer Alley II — Cancer Alley being the moniker given to a stretch of the Mississippi River Valley between Baton Rouge and New Orleans, La., known for its high cancer rates tied to plastics and petrochemicals developments and other chemical and fossil fuels industrial developments. For more on the anticipated Appalachian Storage HUB/Petrochemical Complex you can visit OHVEC.org. For a chilling global look at the effects of plastics production, I recommend the documentary film “The Story of Plastics,” which you can get info on how to view at storyofplastic.org. The environmental damage and human rights abuses and health threats from the lifecycle of plastics are almost unfathomable.

It’s time for the people of the Ohio River Valley, West Virginia and all of Appalachia to look past fossil fuels and chemical industry hype and work toward a future of sustainable development and agriculture, renewable energy, maximum energy efficiency, clean water, air and soil, responsible stewardship of resources, and environmental conservation and preservation. It’s time we stop sacrificing our health and well-being to make a few people and entities even more obscenely rich. It’s time we value and bargain with our labor the way industry values and bargains with capital, and that we have a state and federal government writing, restoring and implementing laws, rules and regs to permit this. Keep in mind, these industries don’t work for you; they work for their profit margins, shareholder dividends, executive compensation packages and market shares. They’re not beholden to you, they’re beholden to their bottom lines. We can have a better future in Appalachia, but not by sticking with the industry playbook. Demand more.

*** Eric Engle is a Parkersburg resident. He is chairman of Mid-Ohio Valley Climate Action, chairman of the WV Sierra Club Chapter Executive Committee and a board of directors member for the West Virginia Rivers Coalition.

“Normal” is what’s killing us

Letter To the editor, July 8 The Athens News by Aaron Dunbar

“New Data Show Air Pollution Drop Around 50 Percent In Some Cities During Coronavirus Lockdown” (Forbes, April 16)

“Air pollution falls by unprecedented levels in major global cities during coronavirus lockdowns” (CNN, April 23)

“Carbon emissions dropped 17 percent globally amid coronavirus” (NBC News, May 19)

Feel-good headlines such as these have been a dime a dozen throughout the course of the COVID-19 pandemic. And why not? In times like these, we could all use some consolation about the state of the world around us.

I’ve been told, usually by those opposed to taking real action on climate, that I should be celebrating the above facts, and see them as a victory to the cause of combating climate change. Setting aside that I would never wish the illness and deaths of millions of people as a means to this end, it is impossible for me to view such statistics as anything but a distracting hiccup, all to be undone as we race to restore our deadly ideas of “normalcy.”

It’s said that the body begins to heal itself within minutes after giving up cigarettes. But you can’t go cold turkey for a month or two, then return to smoking a pack-a-day and expect to see any genuine benefit to your health. And so it goes with the planet we call home.

Perhaps, then, we should be placing far greater focus on headlines like these:

“Atmospheric CO2 levels rise sharply despite Covid-19 lockdowns” (The Guardian, June 4)

“Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Levels Are at Their Highest in 23 Million Years” (EcoWatch, June 4)

“Atlantic hurricane season already record-breaking — and minority communities disproportionately at risk” (The Independent, June 5th)

“Earth Just Had Its Record Warmest May, Multiple Analyses Found” (The Weather Channel, June 12)

“Climate worst-case scenarios may not go far enough, cloud data shows” (The Guardian, June 13)

“The Arctic Circle Hit 100°F Saturday, Its Hottest Temperature Ever” (Forbes, June 22)

For all our talk of returning to normal, we continually fail to grasp that “normal” is what’s killing us in the first place. We’re running out of time to prevent an unprecedented and irreversible collapse of the biosphere, and now is the time for taking the off-ramp we’ve been given. We must desperately push for a green recovery to this pandemic, or risk sleepwalking into a crisis that will make COVID-19 seem like child’s play by comparison.

Indigenous lives matter

Letter to the Editor Jul 7, 2020 Marietta Times by Aaron Dunbar

“The members of Mid-Ohio Valley Climate Action would like to express our heartfelt appreciation for and solidarity with the people of the Wet’suwet’en First Nation. We believe wholeheartedly in the sovereignty and right to self-determination of First Nations, and rebuke all parties who would infringe upon such rights.”

So began a statement I authored on behalf of MOVCA in February of this year, in support of the Wet’suwet’en Nation in Canada. The country had recently been brought to a standstill by Indigenous protesters and their allies, who were blocking off railways, border crossings, service roads and more, as a response to the illegal construction of a pipeline, backed by the Canadian government and the force of the RCMP, across Wet’suwet’en land.

The members of MOVCA’s leadership team were instantly supportive of my authoring the above statement, and even went so far as to make a sizable financial contribution to the Wet’suwet’en people, to aid them in their struggle against TransCanada (aka, TC Energy), the same company infamous for terrorizing Native Americans at Standing Rock only a few short years ago. I was deeply moved by all of this, and remain incredibly grateful for our little organization’s willingness to step up at a moment when others were truly in need.

I don’t think I’ve ever harbored delusions about Indigenous peoples around the world being a particularly privileged class. But my ongoing education on environmental issues has largely opened my eyes to just how hideously Indigenous groups are treated, both in the U.S. and abroad.

It’s been said that Indigenous people, who make up less than 1% of the world’s population, are responsible for the stewardship of around 80% of the planet’s biodiversity. They are, as indicated above, frequently victimized for this fact- one need only to look at Jair Bolsonaro’s treatment of Amazonian tribes to understand the extent of such environmental racism.

Oil, gas, and other extractive industries have become increasingly known for the established links between “man camps” and a rise in missing and murdered Indigenous women. In the U.S., Native Americans are shot and killed by police at a higher rate than any other demographic. The ongoing pandemic has also been particularly devastating to America’s Indigenous people, with the Navajo Nation, in May, surpassing New York state as having the highest rate of infection across the U.S.

In May, Canadian politician Sonya Savage prompted outrage with her observation, “Now is a great time to be building a pipeline because you can’t have protests of more than 15 people. Let’s get it built.” I couldn’t think of a more concise depiction of the fossil fuel industry’s depravity, or the contempt for Indigenous sovereignty shown by colonial nations like the U.S. and Canada, if I tried.

As calls for racial justice continue to ring out across the country, there’s been some discussion over renaming Ohio’s capital city of Columbus. I wholeheartedly support these efforts. Christopher Columbus was, first and foremost, a genocidal maniac who sex trafficked Indigenous women and girls, some of them as young as nine years old. He wasn’t a “product of his time” (as if this is any kind of excuse anyway), as even his own men were shocked by the extent of his brutality.

It’s time to stop worshipping men like Columbus, George Washington (nicknamed “Town Destroyer” by the Iroquois), and Andrew Jackson (known as “Indian Killer,” and architect of the Trail of Tears.) These men were monsters, not role models. Tearing down statues and taking serial killers’ portraits off our currency is hardly a fraction of what must be done to provide justice to America’s Indigenous population, but it is a necessary first step. The debt we owe to Native Americans is, frankly, as incalculable as it is unpayable, and it is long past time for us to recognize that fact.

MOVCA Third Thursday Program goes virtual

Neighborhood News Marietta Times Jun 17, 2020

PARKERSBURG, W.Va. – Mid-Ohio Valley Climate Action’s June 18 Third Thursday program will be a virtual panel and open discussion beginning at 7:00 p.m. on the Zoom platform. This is the group’s first attempt at offering a Third Thursday program virtually.

The discussion will center on actions and reactions to the recently released documentary, The Story of Plastic. Participants will have the opportunity to view the film on their own schedule in their own homes prior to reconvening for the Zoom meeting to discuss how to #BreakFreeFromPlastic.

“MOVCA is pleased to offer this as a public program, open to the community,” said Adeline Bailey, program organizer. “You can get a free ‘ticket’ to view the documentary by signing up on our page on Eventbrite (eventbrite.com/e/movca-june-2020-third-thursday-story-of-plastic-tickets-107293196840). Once you’re registered, we will send you a link to view the film, along with an invitation to get into the Zoom meeting on the 18th.”

The discussion on Zoom will include presentations from a panel of speakers: Bev Reed, community organizer and liaison for Concerned Ohio River Residents, John Detwiler, a long-time member of the Marcellus Protest in Pittsburgh; Alex Cole, community organizer for the Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition; and Dr. Randi Pokladnik, researcher and columnist on environmental issues impacting the Appalachian region. MOVCA chair Eric Engle will moderate the panel.

Climate justice is racial justice

Letter to the Editor Marietta Times Jun 12, 2020 by Aaron Dunbar

Today I’ve been privileged to sit among the citizens of Marietta as they held a peaceful demonstration honoring George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, Ahmaud Arbery, and so many other black and brown lives cut inexcusably short by police brutality.

I would first like to applaud all those who dedicated their time and effort to making this event happen. I am especially grateful to those people of color in our community who came forward to share their experiences, and make their voices heard. I’m not ashamed to admit I was in tears more than once throughout the afternoon’s events.

I’ve been giving a great deal of thought to what I, as a white male living in America, should write about our nation’s long-standing disregard for black, brown, and indigenous lives. I’ve found that for many months now, I’ve been unable to avoid viewing current events through the ever-widening lens of the climate crisis. And on June 5th, as people of color in America continued their centuries-long struggle for basic human dignity, scientists at Europe’s Copernicus Climate Change Service announced that May of 2020 was the hottest ever recorded. The confluence of these two seemingly disparate historical occurrences promptly brought to mind the words of writer Matthew Todd, who says the following in an essay for Extinction Rebellion:

“Unfortunately, many of us who are concerned with social justice and identity politics, including the wider left-wing movement (as well as, of course, the right), have made what is looking every day more like a fatal mistake. We have not given any thought to how the express train of ecological breakdown will smash through this delicate diversity we have spent so much time building brick by brick.”

This idea is not so much hypothetical as it has been an observable fact of our reality in recent years. Take for instance the twin migrant crises of Syria and Central America, both of which sprang, in no small part, from rising global temperatures and drought caused by climate change. The attempts by climate refugees to migrate to white majority nations such as the U.S. have unearthed explosive wells of racial animosity and anti-immigrant sentiment, in a society that far too often fancies itself some sort of post-racial utopia.

Speaking to the matter now at hand, one need only to think back to Hurricane Katrina, one of the first major storms ever discussed in relation to climate change, to predict how little regard our government is likely to show for black lives as myriad ecological catastrophes converge upon and upend civilization.

The climate crisis, as it pertains to race, is one fraught with grotesque ironies. Black, indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC) communities, at home and abroad, far too often find themselves the target of exploitation by the very same industries mutilating our planet. They bear the brunt of externalized costs for these industries in the short-term, from negative health effects to social and economic consequences. And despite contributing minimally to the climate crisis themselves, the people in these communities are the most likely to be hit earliest, and hardest, by disasters such as droughts, food and resource scarcity, violent weather patterns, geographic displacement, and in far too many cases, the vanishing of their homes altogether.

It is not enough to verbally reject racism. It is imperative that we work to build a sustainable world, and in doing so create an environment in which human beings from all walks of life can flourish, living out safe, healthy, and meaningful lives.

The future will be green or not at all

Letter to the Editor Marietta Times by Aaron Dunbar Jun 2, 2020

“There have been calls for a moratorium on the approval and construction of new natural gas pipeline projects and Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) during the COVID-19 pandemic,” Congressman Bill Johnson wrote in a May 1st Facebook post.

“As a result, I – along with a bipartisan group of four colleagues – signed on to a letter strongly urging the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to continue processing, reviewing, and accepting projects in a manner consistent with regular business, as COVID-19 health and safety guidelines allow. American prosperity and energy security are closely linked, and that is why the energy sector is so critical to our current response and will be key driver of our recovery. The maintenance and development of critical energy infrastructure – such as natural gas pipelines and liquified natural gas (LNG) export facilities – is vital to the nation’s safety, prosperity and well-being. A moratorium would be unnecessary and detrimental to our economic recovery.”

I can’t help but wonder whether Johnson is far more concerned with his own prosperity and well-being than that of our nation. Having received over $600,000 in campaign contributions from the fossil fuel industry over the course of his political career, his presence in congress appears to hinge upon his catering to the whims of his corporate owners.

Examining his list of donors during the current election cycle, available via OpenSecrets.org, a prominent name stood out to me- that of Koch Industries.

According to a 2012 article from ThinkProgress.org, Johnson was one of several Republicans to sign onto an anti-climate protection pledge from the advocacy group Americans for Prosperity, which “opposes any legislation relating to climate change that includes a net increase in government revenue.” The group was founded in 2004 by the Koch Brothers.

Johnson’s continued catering to the fossil fuel industry, however unsurprising, is a disgrace. If the current pandemic has taught us anything, it’s that the system we now have in place is an extremely volatile one.

We’ve seen oil prices plunge into the negative dollar amount for the first time in history, at the precise moment when scientists tell us we have approximately a decade to address the crisis of climate change – which will, by all accounts, dwarf the current pandemic by comparison. We need a green recovery, and we need it now.

Congressman Johnson constantly rallies against government spending and extols the economic virtues of the oil and gas industry, conveniently overlooking reports such as one published in 2019 by the International Monetary Fund, noting that fossil fuels are globally subsidized to the tune of $5,000,000,000,000 per year. Or reports that the costs of climate change could amount to $8 trillion by 2050, to say nothing of the toll in human lives. Or that trying to fight climate change now, rather than later, could save the U.S. a whopping $20 trillion by the end of the century.

In the words of Australian politician and environmentalist Bob Brown, “The future will either be green or not at all.” It seems that even in a time of unprecedented crisis, men like Congressman Johnson are hell-bent on guaranteeing us the latter fate.

Caught between supply and demand

Local Column Marietta Times May 9, 2020

By David E. Ballantyne

Little in my experience prepared me for a Pandemic. I am an engineer by training; thus, a student of science.

I have high respect for the methods and principals within science.

Of course, those methods and principals are applied by humans.

Thus, show me the data and the evidence.

But we all largely know that it is just a matter of time until science finds a vaccine for coronavirus-19.

In the meantime, it is a nuisance for most of us and a tragedy for some.

I support learning our lessons for adapting to the nuisance.

Parallel to the Pandemic is Climate Change. I am a Climate Activist.

I have studied the evidence and as an engineer and a student of science, there is no doubt in my mind but what Climate Change is a threat of equal gravity as the current Pandemic.

Science indicates that Climate Change is largely caused by carbon emissions trapping heat in the atmosphere.

The bulk of the change in these emissions is due to human use of Carbon Fuels.

These fuels are used for generating electricity, fueling internal combustion transportation engines, home and building heating and cooling and industrial processes for making products such as metals, plastics and cement.

As with the Pandemic, addressing Climate Change requires behavioral changes to avoid risks — changes which are an inconvenience; but, if not avoided are a tragedy for some of us. And with both issues, behavioral changes require the need for “building public will” to convince people to accept the changes required to address avoiding risk.

Those behavioral changes address the supply/demand balance for the Virus or for Carbon Emissions.

Climate Scientists have for years called for global reduction in Carbon Emissions without substantive success.

However, over the past three months, when a good portion of the global population have been sheltering in their homes, Climate Change inducing Carbon Emissions were substantively reduced — by not driving automobiles and not using public transport, particularly airplanes.

Air quality improved and air pollution induced illnesses declined.

And, what we also learned was that certain segments of the population are significantly disadvantaged to the risks.

For Climate, we call them refugees.

For the Pandemic, we call them old, ill or poor. Addressing it is a matter of Public Will and Human ingenuity.

And a merger of Science and Human Desire.

I think addressing it can be done without giving up our accustomed lifestyle.

And, we have seen surprising bipartisanship in the past three months.

Don’t do more damage

Letter to the Editor Parkersburg News & Sentinel, May 9 by Eric Engle

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has recently issued a Public Notice (20-07), which states that Deeprock Disposal Solutions LLC has submitted an application under the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 to construct a waterfront barge loading and offloading facility on the Ohio River by Rt. 7 to transfer traditional oil and gas well waste to existing upland storage tanks.
More oil and gas waste being shipped to Ohio up the Ohio River, doesn’t that sound wonderful?
Here we are in the midst of the worst pandemic in this country in 100 years and the oil and gas industry is trying to push through risky permitting to allow more dangerous waste to be offloaded and dumped here. This waste could be shipped in from as far away as Texas and Oklahoma. Oil and gas waste has been shown to be radioactive, it contains high salinity, and it has been shown to contain known carcinogens. This is a danger to area aquifers and groundwater, and the Ohio River is a drinking water source for 5 million people and is already one of the most contaminated and polluted waterways in the country.
The permit application itself states that the barge lodging and offloading dock is within the known or historic range of the endangered Indiana bat, the threatened northern long-eared bat, the endangered fanshell mussel, the endangered pink mucket pearly mussel, the endangered sheepnose mussel, and the endangered snuffbox mussel. A trip to the Ohio River Islands National Wildlife Refuge will inform you that these and other mussel populations have already been impacted heavily by the dredging and damming of the Ohio River for river commerce, and that these water purifying mussel species are critical to the river valley’s ecology and river health.
Mid-Ohio Valley Climate Action has joined other organizations in asking for a public hearing and extension of the public comment period on this waste offloading station. The people of the Mid-Ohio River Valley, on both sides of the river, need to say no to this nonsense. COVID-19 has decimated the oil and gas industry and our focus needs to be on energy transition, not clinging to the past and continuing to pollute and contaminate already devastated communities.

A legacy of externalized costs

Letter to the Editor, Marietta Times by Victor Elam, May 6

Externalized costs are costs that are generated by one party who benefits but a third party pays for those costs directly or indirectly. The Mid-Ohio Valley is rife with examples of its residents and its lands paying the price while others reap the rewards, from forest harvest in the early 1900’s followed by oil, coal, gas extraction to industry leaving behind poisoned employees and lands.
One such example occurred in 1999 when an industry near Marietta released harmful chemicals into the Ohio River that killed thousands of fish and at least 990,000 mussels over a 20 mile stretch of the river. The guilty parties paid a 3.25 million dollar penalty for their misdeed yet 30 years later and after great efforts to restore the mussel population, the population has not recovered.
The public often has no opportunity to have a voice when these externalized costs are forced upon them, but there is a proposal submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) that will require a permit and is subject to public comment and it so happens to have potential to affect the same area as the chemical release in 1999. The proposal is to bring well waste by barge to a docking site and pump the waste material from the barge to existing holding tanks where it will then be transferred to trucks and transported to area injection wells for disposal. So here again the residents of the MOV are subjected to risk of contamination from spills or unknown risks resulting from the injection wells to help others profit while we get nothing. If something does go wrong, we will suffer or the environment in which we live will and no amount of money will be able to correct the damage.
I encourage you to provide comment regarding this project to: lrh.usace.army.mil/missions/regulatory/public-notices/article/2142164
Unless an extension is granted, comment is being taken until May 6. In the past public hearings were held for these types of actions but the USACE has elected to forego those hearings and only accept comment online. If you feel that this should be delayed until we can have a proper public hearing please let the Huntington District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers know.